BỐN DẠNG CHÍNH TRONG IELTS WRITING TASK 2

BỐN DẠNG CHÍNH TRONG TASK 2

1) Some people think that the government should provide free education to students in university. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
=> AGREE/ DISAGREE

Đồng ý hoàn toàn, hoặc không đồng ý hoàn toàn-> dễ viết view 1, khó viết view 2

Đồng ý 1 phần, ra giống discuss both views.

The area of education has, for long, generated conflicts among various communities. Although some people say that students pursuing higher education should receive free education from the government. I disagree with this perspective, and in this essay, reasons supporting my viewpoint will be provided.

Some individuals are of the claim that providing university education without any cost that students must bear is highly beneficial and should be implemented by the government. Personally, I totally/ partly agree/ disagree with this suggestion based on some majors reasons that are explained in this essay.

Opinions are divided on whether university students should receive formal education from the government without bearing any cost. Even though this proposition has its merits in certain respects, I believe it presents several problems and should not be entirely adopted.


Main 1- chứng minh tại sao nên miễn phí giáo đục đại học

- Help poor students
- More access to education
- Encourage people to learn more
- Alleviate financial burden on students
- Finding talented individuals
- Foster a sense of equality which gives poor students a chance
- Improve the economy.

Tự viết: Those advocating to this suggestion justify their rationale with equal access to education. Due to financial burden, many students, especially ones with disadvantageous backgrounds, meet difficulties while pursuing higher education. Providing them with free learning programs is prone to foster a strong sense of equality as they are given the chance to compete with their peers without paying considerable tuition fees to do so. This will eventually assist the authorities in finding gifted individuals, leading to an abundant and well-educated workforce for the country in the foreseeable future.

Giáo dục hiện tại có phần inaccessible-> đưa ra lí do hoặc ví dụ-> dẫn đến các problems: list ra-> nếu free tuition cho hs đại học, sẽ giải quyết được các vấn đề trên.

Sample: On the one hand, there are some persuasive rationales that support the claim that university education should be free of charge.
-> In this day and age, due to stagnant inflation, the cost of education has increased significantly, causing problems for individuals to make a university entry if they come from disadvantageous socio-economic backgrounds. This would result in their inability to contribute to the workforce, making the country fail to develop effectively. With tuition fees waiver, many talented individuals can contribute to the workforce, boosting economic development and transforming the quality of living of the whole population.
-> Nowadays, the cost of education has increased significantly due to the higher demand for quality, teaching facilities, and human resources, effectively prohibiting students with lower means of living from entering universities. This issue leads to the inability of talented individuals to contribute to their nations’ workforce, slowing down economic development. If university entrance is given for free, such a problem would not occur, helping the nation develop better (boosting the nation’s economic growth and transforming the quality of living of the whole population) thanks to an improved workforce.

Vậy có thể sửa bài tự viết:
Those advocating to this suggestion justify their rationale with equal access to education. In this day and age, the cost of education has increased significantly under the effects of stagnant inflation. Due to financial burden, many students, especially ones with disadvantageous socio-economic backgrounds, meet difficulties while pursuing higher education. Providing them with free learning programs is prone to foster a strong sense of equality as they are given the chance to compete with their peers without paying considerable tuition fees to do so. This will eventually assist the authorities in finding gifted individuals, leading to an abundant and well-educated workforce that help boost the nation’s economic growth and transform the quality of living of the whole population.

Main 2- chứng minh tại sao không nên miễn phí giáo đục đại học

- Nhiều học sinh quá
- Yêu cầu tăng cao về cơ sở vật chất
-> Cần rất nhiều chi phí

Tự viết: However, despite the idealistic outcomes that would happen after tuition fees are made free of charge, I believe that its actual application could bring about many obstacles and problems. Providing free education means that the government’s budget is obliged to cover an enormous number of highschool-leavers, which is also followed by a higher demand for adequate teaching facilities. Such an expenditure on solely education is likely to have a negative impact on the state budget which, at the same time, has to be allocated to other sectors such as healthcare or foreign investments. Instead, the authorities should consider creating more scholarships or free trials to help the disadvantaged students without harming the nation’s prosperity.

Sample: On the other hand, despite the realistic nature of making university education free of charge, its actual application could bring about many obstacles and problems. The coverage of such an expenditure means that the government is required to handle an increasing amount of tuition fee and a large number of students. Also, some nations, especially developing ones, may not have a flexible budget to can be spent on such a large expense. As a result, if the proposal of removing the financial obligations for students is implemented, many governments would not manage to complete such task.

Kết bài
In conclusion, while the students coming from disadvantaged backgrounds should have an equal chance to contribute to the nation by receiving financial support from the authorities, ones who can pay still need to follow through with their financial obligations to not put the nation at economic risks.

2) Some people indicate that apartments are the best types of housing, while others argue that private houses in the streets are better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
=>DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION

Some individuals are of the opinion that the optimal type of accommodation is apartments. In contrast, others think that residing in a private house in the street is a superior option. Although both schools of thought (trường phái tư tưởng) offer merits, I agree more with the view that the final decision should be made based on the actual needs of each household.

Body 1: viết view 1-> nhà chung cư
giá rẻ-> người có thu nhập tb tới thấp

On the one hand, those advocating to the idea that apartments are the best accommodation types have their own persuasive justifications. On the same area of land, the construction of apartments would generally yield a larger number of housing units compared to what can be achieved if private houses are built. Also, the shared facilities and amenities would reduce the demand for travel, further cutting down the cost of living. Thus, the affordability makes apartments suitable for citizens receiving lower incomes, who generally make up for the largest portion of our population.

Body 2: nhà mặt đất
- privacy/ private spaces/ open spaces/ no disturbances from other people.
- valuable in real-estates.

On the other hand, opponents of previous view claim that private houses in the street are a better form of accommodation. The close proximity with other residents, which is common in apartment complex, may disrupt the personal living space. For houses in the street, such an issue could be mitigated due to the insulation from the outside environment. Besides, the value of private houses in the street has been proven to increase better compared to apartments, making them a worthy form of investment that yields more value in the future. Therefore, households with higher means of living that seek for privacy would suit this type of accommodation better.

Kết bài

In conclusion, I believe that the ultimate decision needs to be made according to the demand and financial conditions of each household, If a family values privacy and has an interest in investment, a private house in the street is a superior option. In contrast, the lower cost of living associated with apartments is inevitably the best choice for individuals with lower levels of income.





3) Nowadays, some nations tax sugar more heavily to help citizens eat healthy. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
=>ADVANTAGES/ DISADVANTAGES

In many parts of the world, sugar is taxed more heavily to assist inhabitants in adopting a healthier diet. In this essay, I would evaluate both the pros and cons before proposing whether or not the positive aspect outperform its drawbacks.


On the one hand, there are some benefits associated with imposing a higher tax level on sugar to improve the diets of citizens.

Tự viết: This ingredient has for long had a hold on people of all ages because of its addictive nature towards our gustatory nerve, easily leading to excessive consumption. A diet which contains too much sugar poses a considerable number of risks to people’s health conditions, such as obesity, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Such long-term health problems are common in the United States, one of the nations that consume sugar the most. Therefore, taxing sugar more heavily would make citizens reconsider a less-sugar or sugar-free diet, which is prone to improve the overall well-being of the whole population.

Sample: As sugar is highly affordable and can enhance the taste of many dishes, it is virtually present in many parts of our diets, causing excessive accumulation of fats that lead to health problems, ranging from obesity to cardiovascular diseases. If the price of sugar is made more expensive, its consumption may plunge, helping people eat better and avoid health issues. This would relieve a lot of burden on each citizen and the whole healthcare system.


On the other hand, this measure would have some problematic implications that should receive more attention.

Tự viết: It is a matter of fact that there are a wide variety of races and ethnicities that are co-existing within a country. This diversity leads to a significant difference in culinary culture, by which an imbalance in the amount of sugar consumed by different households is present. For example, the Vietnamese have the tendency to put more sugar in their food to create striking flavours compared to their Scandinavian counterparts, those who are famous for their raw ingredients. As a result, some people may have to suffer economically more than the others if the price of sugar increases, which fosters a sense of resentment and dissatisfaction in society.
Sample: Sugar has been an important part of our diets for many centuries as it exists in various forms and in many types of food, which ultimately gives us energy to function. When the price of sugar increases, many food that have moderate amounts of it would have the price surged according, causing problems for people’s accessibility to food and prompting backlashes (phản ứng dữ dội) from general consumers.

In conclusion, while there are health benefits associated with imposing higher tax on sugar, its demerits in terms of interracial disharmony in society are significantly greater.







4) In this era, technology has replaced a lot of human at work. What are the solutions?
=>PROBLEMS/ SOLUTIONS

In this day and age, many occupations have been replaced by technological advancements, increasing the unemployment rate. In this essay, I would explain the reasons leading to this tendency before proposing some effective solutions.

There are some major reasons that explain why technology has replaced many humans at work. First, machines have the ability to function continuously without the need of break time, which is an inevitable requirement for human workers. Second, technological advancements have equipped machines with the ability to make decisions, moderate their actions, and improve the accuracy to a point that cannot be matched by humans. Thus, many jobs have been replaced, and the tendency does not show any sign of stopping.

Despite the severity of this development, governmental intervention along with raising the awareness of each individual could effectively mitigate it. There should be a regulation from the government to better protect the benefits of employees, especially ones that are prone to be replaced by technology. The government should require a specific number of human workers at a factory site, acting a supervisor of machinery works. Also, each citizen must equip themselves with sufficient knowledge to better adapt to changes brought about by technology, which could help them find jobs in novel job markets, such as computer science or machinery design.

In conclusion, many people are losing their jobs due to the higher level of efficiency and effectiveness that technological advancements have brought about. However, the government can still mitigate this by issuing new regulations to protect workers’ benefits and providing more education for people to find more job opportunities in novel job markets.