(Đáp án) Kỳ thi chọn hsg lớp 12 THPT tỉnh Ninh Thuận năm học 2012-2013 đề thi môn Tiếng Anh

SỞ GIÁO DỤC VÀ ĐÀO TẠO
KỲ THI CHỌN HỌC SINH GIỎI LỚP 12 THPT NINH THUẬN NĂM HỌC: 2012-2013 MÔN: TIẾNG ANH
ĐÁP ÁN - HƯỚNG DẪN CHẤM ĐỀ CHÍNH THỨC Câu hỏi Đáp án Điểm
I. LISTENING (50 points), mỗi câu đúng: 2.0 điểm PART 1 1 B 2 2 C 2 3 A 2 4 A 2 5 A 2 6 B 2 7 B 2 8 B 2 PART 2 9 business 2 10 third 2 11 Sport(s) Centre 2 12 (a) cleaner 2 13 Library 2 14 International House 2 15 B659 2 16 (an) office assistant 2 17 answer (the) phone 2 18 11. 30 2 PART 3 19 his castle 2 20 British home 2 21 clean and tidy 2 22 a small present 2 23 everyone 2 24 their family name 2 25 won’t normally 2
II. LEXICO – GRAMMAR (40 points), mỗi câu đúng: 2.0 điểm PART 1 26 C 2 27 A 2 28 D 2 29 A 2 1 30 C 2 31 B 2 32 D 2 33 B 2 34 C 2 35 A 2 PART 2 36 imaginative 2 37 scenery 2 38 amusing 2 39 accompanied 2 40 applause 2
PART 3: xác định đúng đạt 1.0đ, sửa đúng đạt 1.0đ 41 suitable → suitably 2 42 works → work 2 43 strictness → strict 2 44 favour → favourite 2 45 succeed → success 2
III. READING (50 points)
PART 1 (10 points), mỗi câu đúng 1.0 điểm 46 earned 1 47 conditions 1 48 satisfaction 1 49 achievement 1 50 case 1 51 congratulate 1 52 employs 1 53 bonus 1 54 provides 1 55 busy 1
PART 2 (12 points), mỗi câu đúng 2.0 điểm 56 D 2 57 C 2 58 F 2 59 B 2 60 G 2 61 H 2
PART 3 (12 points), mỗi câu đúng 2.0 điểm 62 F 2 63 E 2 64 B 2 65 H 2 66 A 2 67 C 2 2
PART 4 (16 points), mỗi câu đúng 2.0 điểm 68 B 2 69 C 2 70 A 2 71 A 2 72 B 2 73 D 2 74 A 2 75 D 2
IV. WRITING (60 points) PART 1 (10 points) 76
… took my sister (0.1)/ over three hours to finish (0.1) … 2 77
…. (not able) unable (0.1)/ to find anywhere (0.1) …. 2 78
…. have no (don’t have any) intention (0.1)/ of waiting (0.1)… 2 79
… fierce argument (0.1) / broke out between (0.1)…. 2 80
… as the reason for (0.1)/ the delay (0.1) 2 PART 2 (20 points)
Suggested answer for reference
The graph shows the numbers of visitors to Sandown Zoo, Botanical Garden and
Victoria Park from 2000 to 2008. Apart from the period from 2002 to 2005, Sandown
Zoo has been the most popular attraction. In 2000 almost 60 thousand people visited
the zoo. Although this number gradually decreased during the next 2 years, it then
steadily rose until 2007. In this year a children’s zoo was opened, resulting in a sharp
increase from 70 thousand to 100 thousand within one year. In contrast, the number of
visitors to the Botanical Garden increased after a restaurant had been opened in 2001,
from 50 thousand to 62 thousand, but then gradually decreased to 42 thousand in 2008.
The last popular attraction was Victoria Park, with only 25 thousand visitors in 2000.
This number remained steady but in 2005 boating was introduced on the lake and the
number of visitors increased sharply. Unfortunately, however, the number started to decrease in 2007. - 0.2 : introductory sentence
- 0.6 : description of three cases (0.2 for each case) - 0.3 : using conjunctions
- 0.3 : using suitable verbs and accompanied adverbs
- 0.3 : length ( 0.3: 120 words; 0.2: 110 words; 0.1: 100 words)
- 0.3 : giving reasons for any increase or decrease. 3 PART 3 (30 points)
Suggested answer for reference
As more people become better off, some Chinese parents can afford to send
their children overseas to study at universities. Sending kids to study abroad, in my
opinion, has both benefits and problems.
The biggest benefit is that many youngsters can spend the last year of their
high school, learning useful courses such as English. They can save a lot of time
which they would otherwise have to spend on exam-oriented courses.
Their going abroad for higher education also benefits those who don't go, as it
will be less competitive to go to universities in China. The reduction in competi-
tiveness will affect the general rationale of education, i.e. , students will be able to
learn more useful knowledge and skills instead of concentrating on rote learning.
Of course there are other benefits like opportunities to learn more advanced science
and technology, and exposures to different cultures.
Sending kids to study abroad, on the other hand, may lead to a number of
problems as well. For example, it is a lot more expensive to study in a Western
country than in China. Some parents have unrealistic beliefs that their children can
get scholarships or can survive by taking part-time jobs.
Another problem is many youngsters are not adequately prepared for the diffi-
culties they may face when they are in a strange country. Loneliness, homesick-
ness, difficulties in school work, and insufficient language skills all make initial
adjustments especially difficult. Cases of failures are not uncommon.
Parents should be more realistic about their kids. Not all should go abroad.
Some will become more successful in China. (262 words) 4
Holistic marking scheme: Maximum: 30 points Bands Criteria 26 - 30
Ideas – very substantial, relevant and logical. All ideas are well developed and supported.
Organization of ideas is very coherent and well-organized. Very adequate paragraphing with
very appropriate topic and supportive sentences. Very smooth flow of ideas with excellent use of cohesive devices.
Language – Excellent command of English. Very frequent use of excellent complex sentences
without errors. An impressive range of appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language is used.
Evident display of impressive creativity and flair throughout the writing. 21 - 25
Ideas – substantial, relevant and logical. Most ideas are well developed and supported.
Organization of ideas is generally coherent and well-organized. Adequate paragraphing with
appropriate topic and supportive sentences. Smooth flow of ideas with good use of cohesive devices.
Language – Good command of English. Frequent use of excellent complex sentences without
occasional minor errors. A wide range of appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language is used.
Good display of creativity and flair throughout the writing. 16 - 20
Ideas – reasonably substantial, relevant and fairly logical. Some ideas or arguments are well developed and supported.
Organization of ideas is satisfactorily coherent. Flow of ideas is occasionally hindered by the
paragraphs with inappropriate topic and supportive sentences. Satisfactory use of cohesive devices.
Language – Satisfactory command of English. Frequent use of complex sentences with rather
frequent minor errors and occasional gross errors are evident. A satisfactory range of appropriate
vocabulary and idiomatic language is used.
Satisfactory display of creativity and flair in most part of the writing. 11 - 15
Ideas – fairly substantial, occasionally irrelevant and lack logic. Some ideas or arguments lack elaboration and supported.
Organization of ideas is generally weak. Flow of ideas is evidently impeded with one or two
weak paragraphs. Occasionally inappropriate topic and supportive sentences. Fair use of cohesive devices.
Language – Fair command of English. Frequent use of compound sentences. Complex sentences
are few with frequent minor errors and occasional gross errors. A fair range of appropriate
vocabulary. Limited use of idiomatic language.
Occasional display of creativity and flair in writing. Generally, a conventional way of writing. 6-10
Ideas – inadequate, irrelevant and illogical. Many ideas or arguments – lack elaboration and supported.
Organization of ideas is evidently weak. Flow of ideas is evidently erratic and awkward. Most
paragraphs are poor with frequent inappropriate topic and supportive sentences. Weak use of cohesive devices.
Language – Weak command of English. Mostly compound or simple sentences are used.
Complex sentences are hardly used. Frequent gross errors. A limited range of vocabulary. Hardly
any use of idiomatic language.
Hardly any display of creativity and flair in writing. 0 - 5
Ideas – barely adequate, irrelevant and lack logic. Little/ no evidence of ability to put forth ideas.
Organization: coherence is absent in text.
Language: Very poor command of English. Numerous errors impending fluency of communication. No creativity at all 5