Tài liệu tiếng anh sưu tầm

BÀI 1 Children learn more from playing freely after school than doing more organised after school activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argue that children study more from playing freely after school while others disagree and think that doing more established school activities is it more benifical than playing freely after shool

On the one hand , organized after-school activities can also be beneficial to learning. These activities often teach specific skills such as music, sports or languages. For example, if a child joins a soccer club, they can improve their team spirit and self-discipline.

Furthermore, some children may not know how to use their free time wisely, so organized activities can help them stay productive and avoid wasting time on video games or watching TV . For example , when children join a football team or a drama club after school, they learn how to work in a group, communicate effectively, and respect others' opinions. These experiences are essential for building teamwork and leadership skills.

In conclusion, I believe that both free play and structured activities are important for children's development. A balance between the two can help children learn better and enjoy their time after school.

Bài 2 Many parents encourage young people to leave home when they become older, while others think they should stay at home with the family. Discuss both views

It is often argue that teenage should leave home when they older to have more benefit like more independent and more mature while others disagree and think they have to stay at home with family to save money and have more benefit than leave home

On the one hand, many parents believe that leaving home helps young people become more independent. When they live alone, they learn how to manage their time, cook meals, and pay bills. This experience prepares them for adult life. For example, students who go to university in another city often become more responsible and confident. Living alone can also help young people grow emotionally and socially.

In contrast, others believe that staying with family is more beneficial for young adults.One reason is that it helps save money, especially in countries where housing is very expensive. Also, staying at home gives emotional support from parents, which can help young people feel more secure. In many cultures, it is normal for children to stay with their parents until they get married, and it helps keep family relationships strong.

In my opinion, it depends on the situation. If young people are ready to live alone and can support themselves, they should move out to gain independence. However, if they are not financially stable or emotionally prepared, staying with the family is a better choice

In conclusion, both living at home and moving out have benefits. Young people should decide based on their personal needs and circumstances

Bt 3 some people work for the same organisation all their working life whille others believe it is better to work for different organisation discuss both view and give your opinion

It would be argue by some that is it good to work for various company it will bring a lot of benefits.In my opinion .However ,staying at the shame corporations all their working life can bring to worker stability and experience than work for various company

On the one hand ,changing workplaces can provide a broader range of experiences and skills. Employees who work for different organisations are exposed to new challenges, management styles, and technologies, making them more adaptable and versatile. Moreover, switching jobs can often lead to higher salaries and quicker career advancement, especially if the individual is ambitious and capable. This flexibility is particularly important in industries where innovation and adaptability are essential, such as IT or marketing. , changing workplaces can provide a broader range of experiences and skills. Employees who work for different organisations are exposed to new challenges, management styles, and technologies, making them more adaptable and versatile. Moreover, switching jobs can often lead to higher salaries and quicker career advancement, especially if the individual is ambitious and capable. This flexibility is particularly important in industries where innovation and adaptability are essential, such as IT or marketing.

On the others hand, working for the same organisation for a long period can offer stability and deep professional growth. Employees often become experts in their roles and may receive promotions or raises as a reward for their loyalty. Additionally, long-term employees typically develop strong relationships with colleagues and gain a thorough understanding of the company’s culture and operations. For instance, many senior executives in large corporations started at entry-level positions and advanced through years of dedication.

In my opinion, it is better to change organisations during your career. This helps people to develop more skills and be more flexible. The world is changing fast, and workers need to learn and adapt. Trying different jobs can help them find what suits them best

In conclusion, staying in one company gives stability, but changing jobs brings more experience. I believe working for different organisations is better for long-term growth.

Bt 4 somepeople believe that schoolchilden should not be given home work by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework play important role in the education of children discuss both view and give your opinion.

Homework has always been a topic of debate in the field of education. Some people argue that students should not be burdened with homework after school hours, while others believe that homework is a key element of learning.

On the one hand, many people think that homework is unnecessary and puts too much pressure on young children. After spending many hours at school, students need time to relax, play, and spend time with family. Too much homework can cause stress and reduce the time for other important activities such as physical exercise or hobbies. In addition, some students may not have a quiet environment at home or support from parents, which makes completing homework difficult and unfair.

On the other hand, supporters of homework believe it helps students review what they learned in class and improve their understanding. Homework encourages self-discipline, time management, and responsibility. For example, when students do their assignments, they practise solving problems and thinking critically. Also, homework allows teachers to understand how much students have understood the lesson and who needs more support.

In my opinion, a reasonable amount of homework is beneficial for students. It should not be too much to cause stress, but enough to help students revise and become more independent in their studies. The key is to balance homework with rest and other activities so that children can develop in all areas of life.

In conclusion, while some people see homework as a burden, others see it as an important part of education. I believe that homework should be given in moderation to support learning without affecting students' well-being.

BT 5 some people think environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals can do too little.to what extent do you agree or disagee.

There is a growing debate about whether environmental protection should be primarily the responsibility of politicians, as some argue that individuals have too little power to make a difference. While I agree that governments and politicians play a vital role in addressing environmental issues.

On one hand, it is true that politicians have more authority and resources to implement large-scale changes. For example, they can introduce laws to reduce carbon emissions, invest in renewable energy, or enforce strict regulations on industries that pollute the environment. Without political action, it is difficult to create the systemic changes needed to tackle global problems such as climate change or deforestation. This is why many people believe that the responsibility lies mainly with those in power.

On the other hand , individuals should not be seen as powerless. People can make meaningful changes in their daily lives, such as using public transport, reducing plastic use, or recycling waste. When many individuals take small actions, the combined effect can be substantial. Moreover, public pressure often influences political decisions. For instance, when citizens demand greener policies or support eco-friendly companies, politicians are more likely to respond to these concerns. Therefore, individuals can also drive change by influencing the political and economic system.

In conclusion, while politicians have the power to make broad environmental reforms, individuals also have a vital role to play. A combination of political leadership and public participation is essential to effectively protect the environment. I therefore partially agree with the statement but believe that both sides must work together.