lOMoARcPSD| 59114765
MIC WEEK 8
CHAPTER 10: EXTERNALITIES
Introducon
Market failures fall under a category called externalies.
An externality arises when a person engages in an acvity that
inuences the well-being of a bystander- a person whose are not
parcipants in the market at all; but neither of them pay nor
receives any compensaon for that eect.
Negave externalies: ( ex: polluon from automobile exhaust
create smog that other pple have to breath => government
aempts to solve the problem by seng emission standard of cars
, also taxing gasoline to reduce the amount pple drive . Polluon
from noise negavely eect pple’s aural health. => Government
solves problem by: seng the rules for businesses with noise have
to locate far away from the residence area, karaoke bars must
have sound-proof walls & doors )
Posive externalies: (ex: restore historic building pple can
enjoy beauty & sense of history that these building provides =>
Government regulang the
destrucon of historic building & providing tax breaks
to owners who restore them . Research into new technologies
create knowledge that pple can use => Government make up
patent system giving inventors exclusive use of their invenon for
a limited mes.
Welfare Economics: a recap
- Consider a specic market – market for Aluminum
- Recalled from chap 7
Total surplus = Value to buyers – Cost to sellers
Demand curve : reect value
When a market is in equilibrium: when buyers who value the good
more than the price (ae) choose to buy the good / buyers who
value it less than the price (eb) do not buy
lOMoARcPSD| 59114765
At any quanty below Equilibrium level (Q1), value to buyer > cost
to seller increasing quanty raises total surplus, unl quanty
reaches E level
The demand curve reects the value to buyers, and the supply curve reects
the costs of sellers. The equilibrium quanty, QMARKET, maximizes the total
value to buyers minus the total costs of sellers. In the absence of externalies,
therefore, the market equilibrium is ecient.
Negave externalies
- This intersecon determines the opmal amount of aluminum from
the standpoint of society as a whole
- QMARKET, is larger than the socially opmal quanty, QOPTIMUM.
This ineciency occurs because the market equilibrium reects only
the private costs of producon. In the market equilibrium, the
marginal consumer values aluminum at less than the social cost of
producing it. That is, at QMARKET, the demand curve lies below the
social-cost curve. Thus, reducing aluminum producon and
consumpon below the market equilibrium level raises total
economic wellbeing
lOMoARcPSD| 59114765
Bcs of the externality, cost to society of producing AI is larger than the cost to
the AI producer
- How can the social planner achieve the opmal outcome?
+ tax aluminum producers for each ton of aluminum sold. The tax
would shi the supply curve for aluminum upward by the size of the
tax. If the tax accurately reected the external cost of pollutants
released into the atmosphere, the new supply curve would coincide
with the social-cost curve. In the new market equilibrium, aluminum
producers would produce the socially opmal quanty of aluminum.
Aluminum producers would take this cost of releasing pollutants to
the air
- Market price would be with tax ( on producers )
This policy is based on the principle : pple respond to incenves.
Posive Externalies
- Some acvies impose cost on third pares, others yield benets (
ex: educaon)
- To a large extent, the benet of educaon is private:
- Beyond private benet, educaon also yields posive externalies
- More educated populaon leads to more informed voters, tends to
mean lower crime rates, lead to higher producvity n higher wages
for everyone,.
lOMoARcPSD| 59114765
- Government can correct the market failure by inducing market
parcipants to internalize externality
- Negave externalies lead markets to produce a larger quanty than
socially desirable
- Posive externalies lead market to produce a smaller quanty than
socially desire.
Public policies toward Externalies
- Government can respond to externalies in 1 of 2 ways
+ Command- and- control policies
+ Market-based policies
- Government can remedy an externalies by making certain
behaviors either required or forbidden (ex: its a crime to dump
poisonous..)
Command-and Control Policies: regulaon
- Its impossible to prohibit all pollung acvies ( ex: all form of
transportaon produce some undesirable pollung by product. For
cars n motorbikes under operaon, polluted gas discharge into the
air )
- Environmental regulaons can make many forms:
+ Maybe tax level of polluon that a factory may emit or
+ Firm adopt a parcular technology to reduce emissions
lOMoARcPSD| 59114765
- Problem: regulator must know all of the details of an industry n
alternave technology in order to create ecient rules.
Market-based Policies
- Correct taxes and subsidies
- An ideal correcve tax: equal the external cost
- 2 soluons are considered
+ Regulaon : tell each factory to reduce it polluon to
300 tons if glop/year . Dictate level of polluon
+ Correcve tax: levy a tax on each factory , $50,000/ton of glop it
emits give factory owners an economic incenve to reduce
polluon
Correcve tax can reduce negave externalies at a lower cost than
regulaon bcs the tax essenally places a price on negave
externalies ( ex:polluon)
Economists also argue that correcve tax a beer for the
environment
- Unlike other taxes, correcve taxes enhance eciency rather reduce
- Tradable polluon permits
+ Allows the holder of the permit to pollute a certain amount : if the
factory produces more polluon it has to buy permits of other rm, if
less buy permits
- Firms that have a high cost of reducing their polluon will be willing
or pay a high price for the permits
- Those rms that can reduce polluon at a low cost will sell
- Tradable polluon permits set the quanty for polluon permied
>< a correcve tax set the price of polluon ( set the tax )
- Either method can reach ecient soluon in the market
- Tradable polluon permits may be superior
Private Soluons to Externalies
Types of private soluons
- Moral codes n social sancon
lOMoARcPSD| 59114765
- Private markets can oen solve the problem of externalies by
relying on self-interest of relevant pares n cause ecient mergers.
- Theses externalies could be internalized if keepers merges with the
apple orchard.
- Another way: for the interested pares to enter in a contract
+ Ex: contract between apple grower n beekeeper can solve the
problem of too few trees n too few bees
? How eecve is the private market in
dealing with externalies?
- According to Coase, the proposion that if private pares can
bargain without cost over the allocaon of resources, they can solve
the problem of externalies on their own
- A social planner would compare the benet that Dick gets from the
dog too the cost that his neighbor bears from the barking
- According to Coase theorem, private market will reach the ecient
outcome form its own The Coase theorem says that private
economics actors can potenally solve the problem of externalies
among themselves. - Conclusion:
+ Markets maximize total surplus to buyers n sellers in a market n this
is usually ecient
+ If transacon cost are high, government policy may be needed to
improve eciency
+ Correcve taxes n polluon permits are preferred to command-n-
control policies bcs they reduce the polluon at a lower cost, and
therefore, increase the quanty demanded of a clean environment.

Preview text:

lOMoAR cPSD| 59114765 MIC WEEK 8 CHAPTER 10: EXTERNALITIES Introduction
Market failures fall under a category called externalities.
An externality arises when a person engages in an activity that
influences the well-being of a bystander- a person whose are not
participants in the market at all; but neither of them pay nor
receives any compensation for that effect.
Negative externalities: ( ex: pollution from automobile exhaust
create smog that other pple have to breath => government
attempts to solve the problem by setting emission standard of cars
, also taxing gasoline to reduce the amount pple drive . Pollution
from noise negatively effect pple’s aural health. => Government
solves problem by: setting the rules for businesses with noise have
to locate far away from the residence area, karaoke bars must
have sound-proof walls & doors )
Positive externalities: (ex: restore historic building pple can
enjoy beauty & sense of history that these building provides => Government regulating the
destruction of historic building & providing tax breaks
to owners who restore them . Research into new technologies
create knowledge that pple can use => Government make up
patent system giving inventors exclusive use of their invention for a limited times.
Welfare Economics: a recap -
Consider a specific market – market for Aluminum - Recalled from chap 7
Total surplus = Value to buyers – Cost to sellers Demand curve : reflect value
When a market is in equilibrium: when buyers who value the good
more than the price (ae) choose to buy the good / buyers who
value it less than the price (eb) do not buy lOMoAR cPSD| 59114765
At any quantity below Equilibrium level (Q1), value to buyer > cost
to seller increasing quantity raises total surplus, until quantity reaches E level
The demand curve reflects the value to buyers, and the supply curve reflects
the costs of sellers. The equilibrium quantity, QMARKET, maximizes the total
value to buyers minus the total costs of sellers. In the absence of externalities,
therefore, the market equilibrium is efficient.
Negative externalities
- This intersection determines the optimal amount of aluminum from
the standpoint of society as a whole
- QMARKET, is larger than the socially optimal quantity, QOPTIMUM.
This inefficiency occurs because the market equilibrium reflects only
the private costs of production. In the market equilibrium, the
marginal consumer values aluminum at less than the social cost of
producing it. That is, at QMARKET, the demand curve lies below the
social-cost curve. Thus, reducing aluminum production and
consumption below the market equilibrium level raises total economic wellbeing lOMoAR cPSD| 59114765
Bcs of the externality, cost to society of producing AI is larger than the cost to the AI producer
- How can the social planner achieve the optimal outcome?
+ tax aluminum producers for each ton of aluminum sold. The tax
would shift the supply curve for aluminum upward by the size of the
tax. If the tax accurately reflected the external cost of pollutants
released into the atmosphere, the new supply curve would coincide
with the social-cost curve. In the new market equilibrium, aluminum
producers would produce the socially optimal quantity of aluminum.
Aluminum producers would take this cost of releasing pollutants to the air
- Market price would be with tax ( on producers )
This policy is based on the principle : pple respond to incentives.
Positive Externalities
- Some activities impose cost on third parties, others yield benefits ( ex: education)
- To a large extent, the benefit of education is private:
- Beyond private benefit, education also yields positive externalities
- More educated population leads to more informed voters, tends to
mean lower crime rates, lead to higher productivity n higher wages for everyone,. lOMoAR cPSD| 59114765
- Government can correct the market failure by inducing market
participants to internalize externality
- Negative externalities lead markets to produce a larger quantity than socially desirable
- Positive externalities lead market to produce a smaller quantity than socially desire.
Public policies toward Externalities -
Government can respond to externalities in 1 of 2 ways
+ Command- and- control policies + Market-based policies -
Government can remedy an externalities by making certain
behaviors either required or forbidden (ex: it’s a crime to dump poisonous..)
Command-and Control Policies: regulation -
It’s impossible to prohibit all polluting activities ( ex: all form of
transportation produce some undesirable polluting by product. For
cars n motorbikes under operation, polluted gas discharge into the air ) -
Environmental regulations can make many forms:
+ Maybe tax level of pollution that a factory may emit or
+ Firm adopt a particular technology to reduce emissions lOMoAR cPSD| 59114765 -
Problem: regulator must know all of the details of an industry n
alternative technology in order to create efficient rules. Market-based Policies - Correct taxes and subsidies -
An ideal corrective tax: equal the external cost - 2 solutions are considered
+ Regulation : tell each factory to reduce it pollution to
300 tons if glop/year . Dictate level of pollution
+ Corrective tax: levy a tax on each factory , $50,000/ton of glop it
emits give factory owners an economic incentive to reduce pollution
Corrective tax can reduce negative externalities at a lower cost than
regulation bcs the tax essentially places a price on negative externalities ( ex:pollution)
Economists also argue that corrective tax a better for the environment -
Unlike other taxes, corrective taxes enhance efficiency rather reduce - Tradable pollution permits
+ Allows the holder of the permit to pollute a certain amount : if the
factory produces more pollution it has to buy permits of other firm, if less buy permits -
Firms that have a high cost of reducing their pollution will be willing
or pay a high price for the permits -
Those firms that can reduce pollution at a low cost will sell -
Tradable pollution permits set the quantity for pollution permitted
>< a corrective tax set the price of pollution ( set the tax ) -
Either method can reach efficient solution in the market -
Tradable pollution permits may be superior
Private Solutions to Externalies
Types of private solutions - Moral codes n social sanction lOMoAR cPSD| 59114765 -
Private markets can often solve the problem of externalities by
relying on self-interest of relevant parties n cause efficient mergers. -
Theses externalities could be internalized if keepers merges with the apple orchard. -
Another way: for the interested parties to enter in a contract
+ Ex: contract between apple grower n beekeeper can solve the
problem of too few trees n too few bees
? How effective is the private market in
dealing with externalities? -
According to Coase, the proposition that if private parties can
bargain without cost over the allocation of resources, they can solve
the problem of externalities on their own -
A social planner would compare the benefit that Dick gets from the
dog too the cost that his neighbor bears from the barking -
According to Coase theorem, private market will reach the efficient
outcome form its own The Coase theorem says that private
economics actors can potentially solve the problem of externalities
among themselves. - Conclusion:
+ Markets maximize total surplus to buyers n sellers in a market n this is usually efficient
+ If transaction cost are high, government policy may be needed to improve efficiency
+ Corrective taxes n pollution permits are preferred to command-n-
control policies bcs they reduce the pollution at a lower cost, and
therefore, increase the quantity demanded of a clean environment.