Talent Acquisition Strategy Scorecard - Business English | Trường Đại học Hùng Vương

Talent Acquisition Strategy Scorecard - Business English | Trường Đại học Hùng Vương được sưu tầm và soạn thảo dưới dạng file PDF để gửi tới các bạn sinh viên cùng tham khảo, ôn tập đầy đủ kiến thức, chuẩn bị cho các buổi học thật tốt. Mời bạn đọc đón xem!

ion
Research
n
#HCIresearch
HCI
About HCI Talent Pulse Research
Talent Pulse from the Human Capital Institute (HCI) is a quarterly research e-book that explores the latest trends and
challenges in managing talent. The following HCI disciplines are annually examined:
n
HR Strategy & Analytics
n
Talent Acquisition
n
Learning & Development
n
Management & Leadership
Statistically rigorous, expert data analysis is conducted and supplemented with in-depth thought leader interviews.
Each quarter, a new report is released in conjunction with one of the four HCI talent communities. Topics for each
quarter’s analysis are determined by survey responses of HR and business professionals. This report focuses on
recruiting passive candidates, social media recruitment, and employment branding.
Talent Pulse is designed to provide practitioners and decision makers with prescriptive methods to rehabilitate the
health and wellness of human capital, and empower employees and leaders to effectively address future challenges.
Key Takeaways:
n
Hunting is better than gathering when it comes to passive candidates. Organizations who make passive
candidate recruitment a part of their strategy, who provide a streamlined application process, and know who they
are targeting hire more passive candidates.
n
Relationships matter. Employee referrals are rated as the most effective method for sourcing active candidates.
Though social media for recruiting is used by 72 percent of organizations, only 55 percent agree they are able to
effectively interact with candidates through social media. The challenge for companies is translating numbers of
followers and “likes” into meaningful connections and relationships.
n
A strong employment brand can improve talent acquisition; organizations believe a strong employment
brand can lead to the attraction of more top talent and an increase in quality of hires, yet less than half of the
participants in our study perceive their organization as having a strong brand.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Find your .pulse power, find your
Copyright © 2014 Human Capital Institute. All rights reserved.
Research Partner
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Jibe provides cloud-based recruiting technology solutions that empower the world’s top companies to strategically
identify, attract and engage candidates. Jibe’s Recruiting Intelligence™ is an all-inclusive recruitment marketing
platform, featuring an analytics engine at its core that pulls recruiting metrics from disparate back-end systems and
turns them into actionable insight to guide hiring decisions. Recruiting Intelligence also features a next-generation
talent network, simplifies job distribution, enables optimized mobile and desktop apply, and enhances employee
referrals, significantly improving the overall candidate experience. Full integration with applicant tracking systems,
combined with a SaaS delivery model, provides a seamless solution without disrupting processes or impacting IT
resources.
http://www.jibe.com/
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Research Methodology
Prior to the full survey, a pilot study survey was distributed to a sample of HCI members ( = 58). Our survey results n
determined the three key topics to cover in this edition of Talent Pulse.
To further explore employment branding, recruiting passive candidates, and social media recruitment HCI
surveyed 305 individuals who ranged from individual contributor to C-level positions at their organization. The
majority of respondents are North American (87 percent) and work within the Human Resources (55 percent) or
recruiting function (25 percent). Of the job titles of participants, 43 percent are at the director level or above.
The following industry thought-leaders were consulted and secondary research such as white papers, articles,
and books were used to supplement our quantitative data.
n
Dustin Carper, Employment Brand Strategist, Groupon
n
Rashmi Chanduraj, Director of Talent Acquisition, TGC Global
n
Jim Povec, CEO and Founder, Hiring EQ Executive Search Consultants
n
Sara Stowe, Talent Acquisition Partner, Smarsh
n
Dr. John Sullivan, Professor of Management, San Francisco State University
Figure 1. How many employees are
in your organization? (n = 299)
n
Less than 100
n
Under 1,000
n
1,000 to 10,000
n
Over 10,000
14%
31%32%
23%
How Important is Sourcing
Passive Candidates?
Background
Passive candidates are currently employed individuals who are not actively
looking for a new position but may be interested if the right opportunity
comes along. Companies can benefit from hiring passive candidates
who likely possess the desired training, experience, and expertise for a
particular position. As the economy continues to recover from the great
recession, passive employees may be more likely to consider changing
jobs or companies. According to a recent survey, “super passive” candidates, or candidates who are not willing
to change jobs at all, are down 25 percent from 2012 to 15 percent. As a result, organizations may have more
1
success in luring proven employees into their organizations.
Though there may be more employees who are willing to consider changing jobs and positions, recruiters
struggle to engage passive candidates. It is estimated that 75 percent of recruiters struggle to connect with
passive candidates, most likely due to their approach or lack of time.
2
For companies to successfully hire passive
candidates, they must be able to appeal to the motives and interests of the candidates. Likewise, organizations
3
must be able to manage their company reputation. According to a survey of professionals, 75 percent say they
won’t take a job with a company that has a poor reputation.
4
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Dr. John Sullivan
CEO
Dr. John Sullivan &
Associates
TALENT PULSE PODCAST
“We’re not going to get because we have LinkedIn. There has to be passive candidates
background relatedness. There has to be the passive candidate to want something to trigger
to call, there has to be something in that email that . I don’t think in-house gets their attention
recruiters know how to do that.
Anytime you can talk growth, improvement, and additional responsibility to passive candidates,
that’s what hooks them, not money. It’s working in an industry that they’ve wanted to work in
their whole life.
Jim Povec, CEO and Founder, HiringEQ, Executive Search Consultants
INSIGHT 1:
Strategies for Sourcing Passive Candidates
On average, companies spend 27 percent of their time recruiting strictly passive candidates and report on
average 22 percent of their new hires last year were passive candidates. One goal of this research is to
determine how passive candidate recruitment fits into the strategy of organizations to recruit new hires at distinct
levels of employment (see Figure 2). According to our research, recruiting passive candidates is mainly used
simultaneously with the recruitment of active employees for mid-levels positions (63 percent) and senior level
positions (42 percent). A little more than a third of organizations (35 percent) use passive recruitment as their
primary source of recruiting for senior level positions. Fifty-four percent of organizations say they do not recruit
passive candidates for sourcing entry-level positions.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Figure 2. How does the sourcing of passive candidates fit into
recruiting of the following organizational levels? (n = 271)
n
It is the primary source of recruiting.
n
It is the secondary source of recruiting
(e.g. active candidates are no good).
n
It is simultaneously used with recruiting
active candidates.
n
We don’t source passive candidates for
this position.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
6%
5%
35%
54%
63%
10%
35%
17%
42%
7%
18%
9%
Entry-level positions Mid-level positions Senior-level positions
(n n n = 275) ( = 269) ( = 269)
Percentage of Respondents
INSIGHT 2:
Employee Referrals are Still King of Recruitment
We analyzed the channels organizations use to recruit candidates (see Table 1 and Figure 3). Participants were
asked if the channels were effective for both active candidate recruitment and passive candidate recruitment.
Employee referrals, LinkedIn, online job boards, professional networks, and company career pages are the top
five most utilized channels for sourcing candidates.
For Active Candidates For Passive Candidates
1. Referrals
2. Internal recruiting departments
3. Third-party recruiters
4. LinkedIn
5. Online job boards
1. Referrals
2. LinkedIn
3. Candidate relationship management tools
4. Professional networks
5. Former employees
For both passive and active recruitment, employee referrals and LinkedIn are identified as effective channels of
recruitment. Former employees may be good hires for several reasons: because they may not need additional
training; because they have garnered additional experience and skills elsewhere; and because they may now
better appreciate working at their former company as a result of working for other organizations.
Not surprisingly, active job seekers are
more likely than passive candidates
to search job boards and proactively
communicate with recruiting departments
and recruiting firms. Candidate relationship
management (CRM) systems help
organizations to manage and maintain
connections with passive candidates. The
5
use of this system can be an effective way
of informing passive candidates of positions
relevant to their skills or interests which
may open in the future. In our sample of organizations, only 15 percent say they use CRM tools, however
76 percent say it is effective for recruiting passive candidates. Likewise, organizations may be able to interact
with a particular type of employee by searching professional networks.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
“The avenues are anymore. Applicant not traditional
responses through a newspaper ad and campus-related
recruiting were set channels that . you could track
The margin for error was very minimal. Today, it’s not
quite the same, especially because there are so many
channels. How did this applicant finally get to our
webpage and apply? It’s really tough to judge.
—Rashmi Chanduraj, Director of Talent Acquisition, TGC Global
Table 1. The top reported effective methods for sourcing active and passive candidates.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
LinkedIn 83%
Referrals 79%
Online job boards 77%
Company career pages 67%
Internal recruiting department 66%
Professional networks 66%
Third-party recruitment 53%
Former employees 52%
Alumni associations 39%
Facebook 38%
Industry-specificsocialmedia 37%
Twitter 30%
Online talent communities 30%
Search engine optimization 27%
Print media job posts 26%
Employer videos 21%
Candidate relationship
management 15%
Search engine marketing 14%
Big-data search engines
(e.g. Talent Bin) 11%
Percentage
who use
n
Effectiveforrecruitingpassivecandidates
n
Effectiveforrecruitingactivecandidates
80%
83%
85%
93%
42%
80%
80%
71%
90%
74%
78%
69%
86%
72%
76%
42%
40%
36%
40%
28%
48%
47%
68%
76%
78%
49%
72%
56%
68%
54%
78%
60%
76%
61%
75%
61%
62%
41%
Figure 3. Frequency of use for methods to source candidates —andOf those
who use the method, the percentage who rated it as “effective or very effective”
for sourcing active candidates and for sourcing passive candidates. (n = 312)
INSIGHT 3:
Are you a Hunter or Gatherer for Passive Candidates?
Commitment is necessary to successfully hire passive candidates. Of the participating organizations in this study,
only 51 percent say they know who they are targeting in their passive candidate pools, about one-fifth offer
a streamlined application process for passive candidates (19 percent), and 46 percent say recruiting passive
candidates is part of their workforce planning strategy. Organizations that agree with at least two of the three
prior statements with regards to passive candidates are labeled as “ Hunters”, whereas organizations that agree
with one or less of the statements are labeled as “Gatherers” (see Figure 4). The “Hunters” in this study report
on average that 29 percent of their hires within the past year were passive candidates, whereas the “Gatherers”
report an average of 18 percent as passive candidates.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Figure 4. Percentage of new hires recruited in last
12 months who were passive candidates.
Gatherers Hunters
(n n = 70) ( = 72)
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
18%
29%
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
INSIGHT 4:
Companies Worried about Losing Talent, but Not Straining
Relationships with Competitors
When it comes to recruiting passive candidates (i.e., poaching) from other companies, organizations are not
terribly concerned about damaging their relationship with other organizations. While nearly half of organizations
say they recruit passive candidates from their competitors (47 percent), only 27 percent say they are concerned
about straining relationships with other organizations as a result of employee poaching. Though the majority of
organizations are not apprehensive about relational issues as a result of recruiting passive candidates, nearly
two-thirds of organizations are concerned about other organizations recruiting their talent (66 percent).
Further analysis revealed that larger organizations are significantly more likely to recruit passive candidates
from their competitors compared to smaller organizations. This may be because larger organizations may have
more resources at their disposal to put towards recruiting passive candidates as well as the ability to provide
promotional positions and requisite compensation. Participants in our study who perceive their organizations as
having a strong employment
brand are less concerned
about other organizations
poaching their talent.
This study asked
organizations what actions
they take to prevent their
talent from being poached
by other organizations.
The majority of participants
say they offer competitive
benefits (76 percent) and
half say they offer flexible
work arrangements. Figure 5
displays what companies
are using to keep
employees from leaving
as passive candidates.
Benefits
Flexible work
Non-compete clauses
Paying higher than competition
Employment contracts
Other
Culture
Nothing
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
50%
76%
29%
26%
13%
25%
7%
6%
Percentage of Respondents
Figure 5. What methods does your organization employ to keep your talent?
(Select all that apply; n = 298)
Recruitment via Social Media:
Can Companies Keep Up?
Background
The use of social media for recruitment is the norm for businesses today.
Ninety-two percent of organizations say they use one of the “big three”
social media sites (Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn). Likewise, 14.4 million
people in the United States have used social media to search for a job and
73 percent of organizations say they have made successful hires using
social media.
6
Social media is helping organizations connect and interact with candidates to a stronger degree than ever
before. Social media gives organizations the ability to generate content outside of traditional job postings, such
as blogs, news stories, and online workshops. Eighty percent of professionals say the primary reason for using
social media is the ability to recruit passive candidates who otherwise might not be able to initiate contact with
the organization. Social media is becoming more
7
relevant than traditional channels of recruitment. In a
survey of professionals, 40 percent believe traditional
job posts will be outdated. Likewise, job referrals
and social media were ranked above career pages
and job boards as the most important channels of
recruitment.
8
As social media continues to transform the landscape
of talent acquisition and becomes increasingly
important to organizations, it is deemed necessary to
explore how companies are managing and utilizing
this channel for recruitment.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Sara Stowe, PHR
Talent Acquisition
Partner
Smarsh
TALENT PULSE PODCAST
“Getting involved in social networks is not
about job seeking or job opportunities. It’s
about creating the curiosity in what our
company does…These are smart people and all
I have to do is create the curiosity. If they are
interested, they’ll go check out our website,
they’ll do their research, they’ll ask around. It’s
more so of an employer branding exercise
than it is recruiting.
—Sara Stowe, VP of Talent Acquisition, Smarsh
INSIGHT 1:
Growing Too Fast to Handle?
The use of social media as a platform for recruitment shows no signs of slowing. Seventy-two percent of the
participants
in this survey report using social media for recruitment
within their companies, with 70 percent who
report plans to
increase their efforts within the next six months.
Though social media is a major channel in talent acquisition, organizations find it difficult keep up with the
propensity of candidates to use social media. According to our research, only 56 percent of organizations agree
that social media recruiting is manageable for their recruiters. Likewise, only 61 percent report that they are able
to effectively connect with candidates through social media, and 55 percent agree they are able to effectively
interact with candidates through social media. There is a clear disparity between the propensity to use social
media and the efficiency of organizations using this channel.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
“One we’ll face is making sure that challenge
we’re continuing to that are invest in tools
relevant. We have to make sure we’re keeping
an eye on the relevancy of the tools and not get
comfortable with what’s great today. It might not
be the right tool even next year, it moves that fast.
Sara Stowe, Talent Acquisition Partner, Smarsh
INSIGHT 2:
The Unintended (and Unattended) Consequences of Social Media
We asked survey participants which issues their organization worries about with regards to social media
recruitment (see Figure 6). The most prevalent concerns revolve around the general legal issues (57 percent) and
bias and discrimination (41 percent) of using social media recruitment. Forty-one percent of organizations also
express concerns with managing the high number of connections and responses from candidates via social media.
A survey of organizations that rely on social media revealed 57 percent do not have procedures in place for
recruitment using social media, either formal or informal. Recruiting via social media may become a legal risk
9
for employers. Social media profiles can reveal protected class information, such as race, gender, or a disability.
If this information is used as a basis for an employment decision or to disqualify an applicant, the employer may
face civil rights complaints. As social media becomes a more mainstream channel of recruitment, it is important
10
for organizations to establish clear guidelines for using social media in order to minimize legal risks and maintain
fair practices.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Figure 6. What issues
does your organization
worry about regarding
social media for
recruiting? (Select all
that apply; n = 261)
Legal issues
Overwhelming number of responses
Bias and discrimination
Identifying protected demographics
Applicant reactions
Other
Lackofresourcestoeffectivelyuse
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
57%
41%
41%
23%
27%
16%
5%
Percentage of Respondents
INSIGHT 3:
Train, Track, and Measure the Social Media Channel
To be effective at social media for recruiting we recommend the following:
TrainJust over a third of organizations report offering social media training to recruiters
(34 percent). Organizations who offer training on social media recruitment report higher
percentages of new hires within the past 12 months recruited via social media.
TrackNearly two-thirds of participants report being able to effectively track how candidates found
their organization (65 percent). Organizations who agree they are able to effectively track candidates
are also more likely to agree that social media recruitment is manageable for their recruiters.
MeasureFinally, a
little less than 40 percent
of organizations say they
can effectively measure
the effectiveness of
social media recruitment (39 percent).
We found that organizations who agree
they can measure the effectiveness of
hiring via social media have a stronger
perception of their employment brand,
report earning more revenue from the
previous fiscal year, and report hiring
more employees via social media
recruitment.
Companies who train their recruiters,
track their candidates, and are able to
measure the effectiveness of social
media recruitment report hiring more
candidates via social media (see
Figure 7).
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Figure 7. Percentage of new hires recruited in last 12
months who were recruited via social media. (n = 357)
Measure ( = 95)n
Don’t measure ( = 92)n
Train ( = 101)n
Don’t train ( = 119)n
Track ( = 175)n
Don’t track ( = 55)n
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
19%
32%
18%
33%
26%
21%
Percentage of New Hires Recruited in the
Last 12 Months from Social Media
Employment Branding
Background
Employment branding refers to the positioning and promotion of benefits,
culture, and company values to potential and existing employees. According
to a study by LinkedIn, 82 percent of global recruiting leaders say branding
is a critical factor in their ability to hire top talent. Additionally, 59 percent
11
of professionals believe brand management is important to HR strategy.
12
According to one study, companies with a strong brand had a 28 percent
lower turnover rate compared to companies with a weak brand.
13
Because employment brand is based strongly on the perceptions of the
current employees, it is recommended that professionals build a strategy
around how to influence company perception by employees.
14
Companies
can demonstrate what it expects from its employees and what they can
expect in return by creating an employee value proposition (EVP). EVPs
are important for establishing the employment brand, as it spells out the
employee experience. Organizations have the ability to promote their brand
15
through websites and career pages; likewise, employees are able to divulge
information about their organization through websites, such as Glassdoor, as
well as traditional methods, such as word of mouth. Given how easy it is for
employees to access and communicate via social media, it is recommended
that professionals manage their brand by being open to the feedback
received and having the flexibility to adapt. We explore how organizations are
promoting their employment brands and the consequences of having a strong
(or weak) brand.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Dustin Carper
Employment Brand
Strategist
Groupon
TALENT PULSE PODCAST
Introduction
Methodology
Research
Findings
Conclusions
Appendix
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
INSIGHT 1:
Culture and Values are Key Elements of Employment Brand
We asked participants to rate what elements are important in creating and promoting their employment brand.
Almost all organizations believe culture and values are very or extremely important (94 percent), followed by
career opportunities (82 percent, see Figure 8). According to our participants, the primary functions responsible
for developing and managing the employment brand are marketing (56 percent), human resources (55 percent),
senior leadership (48 percent), recruiting (38 percent), and communications (6 percent).
The majority of organizations are assessing their employment brand on a regular basis. Most organizations
review and update their brand every couple of years (36 percent) or once a year or less (35 percent). Twenty-two
percent of organizations say they never review and update their brand.
Figure 8. Percentage who indicate that the element is “very important” or “extremely
important” in creating and promoting the employment brand. (n = 304)
94%
Culture
and Values
82%
Career
Opportunities
77%
Compensation
andBenefits
73%
Work/life
Balance
71%
Senior
Management
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
INSIGHT 2:
Strong Employment Brand Can Lead to more Quality Hires, Top Talent
Participants were asked about whether or not they perceived their organization as having a strong employment
brand. Less than half agreed that their employment brand is strong (43 percent). Of the organizations who say
they have a strong employer brand, quality of hire (70 percent) and attraction of top talent (70 percent) are top
measured benefits of having a strong brand (see Figure 9). It should be noted that organizations with stronger
perceptions of their employment brand tend to be larger companies and report higher revenue from the
previous year compared to their competitors within their industry.
INSIGHT 3:
Employment Brand Not as Valued as Consumer Brand
Less than a third of organizations in this study agree that their organization places as much emphasis on
employment brand as their consumer brand (31 percent). However, those who agreed with this statement report
larger revenue growth compared to their competitors. This finding was significant, regardless of company size.
Likewise, organizations who agreed with this statement have more highly engaged employees and a stronger
employment brand. Organizations that focus attention on their employment brand may be reaping the benefits of
creating a work environment where the best employees want to work, as suggested by these results.
Figure 9. What
measured benefits
have establishing
an employment
brand brought your
organization? (Select
all that apply; n = 246)
Quality of hire
Attraction of top talent
Retention of top talent
Positive work
environment
Financial success
Other
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
70%
70%
60%
29%
58%
4%
Percentage of Respondents
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
INSIGHT 4:
Threats to your Employment Brand: Safeguarding Reputation in the
Age of Instant Reviews
Organizations are not overly worried about feedback damaging company image; only one-fifth of organizations are
either extremely or very worried about negative reviews affecting employment brand. Thirty percent are moderately
worried, 23 percent are slightly worried, and 27 percent are not at all worried.
Reputation management is handled mainly by internal marketing according to 60 percent of participants,
distantly followed by PR firms (25 percent), trained social media teams (25 percent) and attorneys (23 percent). It
is not unusual for departments to cross-collaborate when it comes to managing reputation, though organizations
need to recognize that certain issues should be handled by the appropriate department.
16
Figure 10. How worried are you about negative reviews or feedback concerning your employment brand? (n = 298)
27%
Not at all
Worried
23%
Slightly
Worried
6%
Extremely
Worried
30%
Moderately
Worried
14%
Very
Worried
Percentage of Respondents
Employer brand is mostly promoted through industry
reputation and word of mouth, rather than from proactive
measures taken to enhance talent acquisition.
HCI Survey Participant
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
How to Improve your Employment Brand
Review your brand as it stands.
By researching your brand, professionals can understand the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for
improving their employment perception. Organizations should gather feedback about their employment brand
from multiple sources, including current employees, former employees, competitors, customers, stakeholders,
and candidates.
Revamp your employee value proposition.
Once an organization has gathered and reviewed its employment brand information, it is imperative to amend
or create a formal employee value proposition (EVP). Within the EVP, organizations will have the ability to
describe details of the experience an employee can expect in this position, including the work environment, total
compensation, the desired work skills and behaviors, and the mission, vision, and values of the organization.
17
Release your content through multiple channels.
Organizations should establish a strategy to continuously communicate their employment brand. Marketing can
positively influence the image of an organization and, as a result, can influence a positive public perception of an
organization as an attractive place to work. Employment
18
brand can be shared in numerous forms, such as news
stories, videos, podcasts, blogs, and through word of mouth.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Talent Acquisition Scorecard
This study asked participants how well their organizations execute the following topics within HCI’s Talent Acquisition
community. Participants rate their organizations as most effective at sourcing, assessment, and recruitment design.
Participants rate their organizations as least effective in data and analytics, and branding and social media.
Recruitment Design
Have a proactive talent acquisition strategy so your company can hire top
quality candidates (mean = 2.76).
Branding and Social Media
Use of social networking to attract active candidates and grab the interest
of passive candidates (mean = 2.27).
Sourcing
Your recruiting strategy has a sourcing plan to gather candidates with the
skills and experience you need, as well as engage them through the entire
selection process (mean = 2.86).
Assessment
Use of assessment methods to determine a candidate’s skill level,
competencies, and behaviors in a variety of work scenarios (mean = 2.78).
Technology
Interview candidates via video, reach new networks with social media and
mobile technology, and gather data to discover the effectiveness of your
talent acquisition efforts (mean = 2.31).
Data and Analytics
Use of comprehensive analytics to identify talent needs, candidate pools,
and methods to evaluate for fit (mean = 2.05).
Targeted Hiring and Design
Create attractive packages, development opportunities, and interesting
work challenges to attract highly skilled candidates (mean = 2.74).
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Prescribe and Apply
The second publication of HCI’s Talent Pulse explores three issues that are momentous to talent
acquisition professionals:
RECRUiTiNg PASSivE CANDiDATES
n
Decide if recruiting passive candidates is worth it
for your company.
Determine if your organization has the need as well
as the ability to recruit and hire passive candidates.
Hiring passive candidates usually requires offering
an elevated position compared to their current job,
more compensation, and the ability to work in a
position and/or industry that piques their interest.
If your organization cannot afford to provide these
amenities to passive candidates it may be a waste
of your company’s time and resources to focus on
creating a passive candidate pool.
n
Create a Passive Cadidate Strategy.
Companies that hire more passive candidates
hunt for their desired talent. Organizations can be
proactive by making passive candidate sourcing a
part of their sourcing strategy, targeting specified
passive candidate pools, encouraging employee
referrals, and putting in place a streamlined
application process for interested candidates.
There are varying levels of passive candidates
and recruiters must have a strategy in place for
each; for passive candidates interested in leaving
their current positions, recruiters may want to be
proactive with their efforts, whereas with super-
passive candidates, recruiters should focus on
building relationships.
n
Continue to enhance your network.
Regardless of the level of interest passive
candidates have in your organization, it is
important to continuously grow your employment
network. Adding passive candidates into your
organization is a more effective method for
introduction compared to cold calls or cold emails.
19
By adding passive candidates to your network,
your company can generate interest by circulating
company publications, job posts, and facilitating
employee referrals.
USiNg SOCiAL MEDiA fOR RECRUiTMENT
n
Establish guidelines for recruiting via social media.
Designate a trained individual or individuals in
legal issues of social media recruitment. Recruiters
should receive continuous education regarding
responsible social media recruitment. Employers
20
need to establish a formal policy for utilizing social
media in recruitment, including a formal procedure
for employees to follow in case they come across
legally sensitive information or demographics.
n
Personalize your communication with employees.
Findings from this study suggest recruiters are
struggling to interact with candidates via social
media. Send personalized emails to candidates
and allow for two-way communication. Social media
will be more effective and valued if customers,
candidates, and employees can engage in active
discussions.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
n
Join professional networks and other outlets.
Besides Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook,
organizations should look beyond these major
social networks for connecting with potential
employees and promoting their organization’s
brand. Companies can find employees with specific
skills from professional networks and niche sites (for
example, Github, a site for software developers).
EMPLOyMENT BRANDiNg
n
focus as much attention on your employment
brand as your consumer brand.
Organizations that place as much emphasis on their
employment brand as their consumer brand report
larger revenue growth in the past year compared
to their competitors, have more highly engaged
employees, and have better perceptions of their
employment brand. To build your employment
brand, start by evaluating your organization’s
culture and values and ask questions about how
your organization can make your organization
a more desirable place to work by both current
employees and candidates.
n
Use social media to promote your company’s brand.
Social media makes it easier than ever for
organizations to share their mission, vision, and
values to the world. Organizations can promote
their brand by creating or sharing a number of
publications, such as new stories, blog posts, press
releases, podcasts, and videos.
n
Be aware of your organization’s employment brand.
By being aware of your employment brand, your
organization can be well informed in order to
guide actions and initiatives. Employment brand
perceptions can be discovered by surveying
employees and also by creating focus groups,
both internally and externally. Finally, organizations
can review discussions and comments on
websites and social media to find out how people
perceive their organization.
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Supplemental HCI Content
Sourcing Passive Candidates
How to Source Passive Talent on Facebook
Stop Missing Talent: A Step-by-Step Guide to
Connecting with Candidates through Social and
Mobile Recruitment
The Myth of Passive Candidates
Using Facebook to Source Passive Talent
Appealing to Passive Candidates at
John Hancock Life Insurance
Social Media for Recruiting
Social Recruiting for the Millennial Generation
Social Recruiting’s Best Kept Secret: Fast-Track
Your Company to Social Recruiting Success With
a Social Talent Community
Strategic Social Media Recruiting
Social and Mobile Recruitin The How to Guideg
The Time is Right to Get Social
Social Media Best Practices
Salesforce’s Social Recruiting Journey
Include Mobile Technology in the Recruiting
Strategy
Employment Branding
Before the First Connection: The Role of
Employer Branding
10 Must-haves for the Employment Brand
Creating and Developing Brand Ambassadors to
Drive Social Brand Awareness and Recognition
Employer_ment Branding
Gear Up Branding and Social Media Infographic
Empowering Employees to Create and
Contribute to a Strong Employer Brand: An
NPR Success Story
Before the Sourcing Even Starts the Role of
Employer Branding
Integrate Employee Culture into the Employer
Brand for Maximum Impact
How Disney Uses YouTube to Create an
Authentic Employer Brand
Webcast
Podcast
Executive
Interview
Blog
Enterprise
Content
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Survey Respondent Demographics ( = 305)n
Only categories with at least 6% are displayed.
87% of respondents’ organizations are based in North America.
FuncTionAl ResponsibiliTy percent
Human Resources 55%
Recruiting 25%
Executive Management 7%
Training and Development 7%
senioRiTy percent
Manager/Team Leader 39%
Director 28%
Team Member 9%
Vice President 7%
indusTRy percent
Financial Services/Real Estate/Insurance 11%
Business/Professional Services 10%
Other 10%
Health care 9%
Government 8%
IT Hardware/Software 7%
Auto/Industrial/Manufacturing 6%
2013 oRgAnizATionAl Revenue percent
less than $10 million 16%
$10-50 million 15%
$50-100 million 11%
$100-500 million 12%
$500-750 million 6%
$1-10 billion 25%
$10-50 billion 7%
Introduction
Passive
Candidates
Social Media
for Recruiting
Employment
Branding
Conclusion
Appendices
Endnotes
1. Browne, B. (2014, March 5). Opportunity knocking: Super-passive
candidates on the decline. . Retrieved from http://www.ere.Ere.net
net/2014/03/05/opportunity-knocking-super-passive-candidates-on-
the-decline/
2. Kutsmode, C., Milne, V. (2014, March 10). 6 classic rules of
engagement for engaging passive candidates via social media. Ere.
net. Retrieved from http://www.ere.net/tags/passivecandidates/
3. Picard, J. (2013, December 20). Recruiting active vs. passive
candidates. [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://talent.linkedin.com/
blog/index.php/2013/12/recruiting-active-vs-passive-candidates
4. See note 3 above.
5. Alibaig, S. (2013, July 30). What can CRM do for talent Acquisition?
[Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://www.hci.org/blog/what-can-
crm-do-talent-acquisition-part-1-2
6. Bennett, S. (2013, October 16). 92% of companies use social media
for recruitment [Infographic]. . Retrieved from http://Media Bistro
www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/social-media-recruiting_b50575
7. Society for Human Resource Management (2013, April 11). SHRM
Survey findings: Social networking websites and recruiting/selection.
Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/
Articles/Pages/SHRM-Social-Networking-Websites-Recruiting-Job-
Candidates.aspx
8. Aberdeen. (2013, May). What is your most effective source of
hire? Retrieved from http://web.jobvite.com/rs/jobvite/images/
Aberdeen%20Sourcing%20Report.pdf
9. McGraw, M. (2013). Risky recruiting business. Human Resource
Executive Online. Retrieved from http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/
view/story.jhtml?id=534355315
10. Bologna, M. (2014). Social media strategies in recruiting, hiring pose
legal risks for employers. . Retrieved from http://Bloomberg BNA
www.bna.com/social-media-strategies-n17179889714/
11. Anders, G. (2012, October 10). LinkedIn’s newest crusade: Fix that
employer brand! . Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/Forbes
sites/georgeanders/2012/10/10/linkedins-newest-crusade-fix-that-
employer-brand/
12. Newcombe, T. (2013, July 9). HR should lead on employer brand
management. . Retrieved from http://www.hrmagazine.HR magazine
co.uk/hr/news/1077686/hr-lead-employer-brand-management-crf-
research
13. Gultekin, E. (2011, December 1). What’s the value of your
employment brand? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://talent.
linkedin.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/whats-the-value-of-your-
employment-brand
14. Smedstad, S. (2014, March 10). #1 thing you need to know about
employer branding [Web log post]. . Retrieved from Blogging 4 Jobs
http://www.blogging4jobs.com/social-media/1-thing-need-know-
employer-branding/
16. Zienlinksi, D. (2014, July). A rep to protect: Sow seeds that yield a
positive image of your company on social media. , HR Magazine
59(6), 95.
15. Collett, A. (2014, March 4). Four key steps to a great employee val-
ue proposition. [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://www.edelman.
com/post/four-key-steps-great-employee-value-proposition/
17. Yates, K., Sejen., L. (2011). Employee value propositions: Creating
alignment, engagement and stronger business results. Towers
Watson. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/multimedia/webcasts/
Documents/11evp.pdf
18. Kim, K. H., Jeon, B. J., Jung, H. S., Lu, W., & Jones, J. (2012).
Effective employment brand equity through sustainable competitive
advantage, marketing strategy, and corporate image.Journal of
Business Research,65(11), 1612-1617.
19. Browne, B. (2014, March 5). Opportunity knocking: Super-passive
candidates on the decline. . Retrieved from http://www.ere.Ere.net
net/2014/03/05/opportunity-knocking-super-passive-candidates-on-
the-decline/
20. McCullough, K., Bisco, J., Cole, C. (2013). Social media and
employment practices liability in recruiting and hiring. . Plus
Retrieved from http://plusweb.org/Journal/DetailsPage/tabid/109/
ArticleID/8/Social-Media-and-Employment-Practices-Liability-in-
Recruiting-and-Hiring.aspx
205 Billings Farm Road, Suite 5
White River Junction, VT 05001
866-538-1909
www.hci.org
#HCiresearch
Copyright © 2014 Human Capital Institute. All rights reserved.
Human Capital Institute
The Global Association
for Strategic Talent Management
Human Capital Institute (HCI)
HCI is the global association for strategic talent management and new economy leadership, and a
clearinghouse for best practices and new ideas. Our network of expert practitioners, Fortune 1000 and
Global 2000 corporations, government agencies, global consultants and business schools contribute a
stream of constantly evolving information, the best of which is organized, analyzed and shared with members
through HCI communities, research, education and events. For more information, please visit www.hci.org.
About HCI Research
HCI is a premier thought leader in the new discipline of strategic talent management with an unparalleled
reputation for innovation, leadership and excellence, demonstrated through cutting-edge research and
analysis. HCI Research draws from the knowledge of a large network of executive practitioners, expert
consultants, leading academics and thought leaders, as well as thorough quantitative and qualitative
analysis, to produce insightful findings and recommendations that shape strategy and encourage action
across the continuum of talent management. To learn more, please visit: http://www.hci.org/content/research.
| 1/26

Preview text:

HCI Research n #HCIresearch ion
About HCI Talent Pulse Research
Talent Pulse from the Human Capital Institute (HCI) is a quarterly research e-book that explores the latest trends and
challenges in managing talent. The following HCI disciplines are annually examined:
n HR Strategy & Analytics Introduction n Talent Acquisition
n Learning & Development Passive
n Management & Leadership Candidates
Statistically rigorous, expert data analysis is conducted and supplemented with in-depth thought leader interviews.
Each quarter, a new report is released in conjunction with one of the four HCI talent communities. Topics for each Social Media
quarter’s analysis are determined by survey responses of HR and business professionals. This report focuses on for Recruiting
recruiting passive candidates, social media recruitment, and employment branding.
Talent Pulse is designed to provide practitioners and decision makers with prescriptive methods to rehabilitate the Employment
health and wellness of human capital, and empower employees and leaders to effectively address future challenges. Branding Key Takeaways: Conclusion
n Hunting is better than gathering when it comes to passive candidates. Organizations who make passive
candidate recruitment a part of their strategy, who provide a streamlined application process, and know who they
are targeting hire more passive candidates. Appendices
n Relationships matter. Employee referrals are rated as the most effective method for sourcing active candidates.
Though social media for recruiting is used by 72 percent of organizations, only 55 percent agree they are able to
effectively interact with candidates through social media. The challenge for companies is translating numbers of
followers and “likes” into meaningful connections and relationships.
n A strong employment brand can improve talent acquisition; organizations believe a strong employment
brand can lead to the attraction of more top talent and an increase in quality of hires, yet less than half of the
participants in our study perceive their organization as having a strong brand.
Find your pulse, find your power.
Copyright © 2014 Human Capital Institute. All rights reserved. Research Partner Introduction Passive Candidates
Jibe provides cloud-based recruiting technology solutions that empower the world’s top companies to strategically
identify, attract and engage candidates. Jibe’s Recruiting Intelligence™ is an all-inclusive recruitment marketing
platform, featuring an analytics engine at its core that pulls recruiting metrics from disparate back-end systems and Social Media for Recruiting
turns them into actionable insight to guide hiring decisions. Recruiting Intelligence also features a next-generation
talent network, simplifies job distribution, enables optimized mobile and desktop apply, and enhances employee
referrals, significantly improving the overall candidate experience. Full integration with applicant tracking systems, Employment
combined with a SaaS delivery model, provides a seamless solution without disrupting processes or impacting IT Branding resources. http://www.jibe.com/ Conclusion Appendices Research Methodology
Prior to the full survey, a pilot study survey was distributed to a sample of HCI members (n = 58). Our survey results
determined the three key topics to cover in this edition of Talent Pulse. Introduction
To further explore employment branding, recruiting passive candidates, and social media recruitment HCI
surveyed 305 individuals who ranged from individual contributor to C-level positions at their organization. The
majority of respondents are North American (87 percent) and work within the Human Resources (55 percent) or Passive
recruiting function (25 percent). Of the job titles of participants, 43 percent are at the director level or above. Candidates
The following industry thought-leaders were consulted and secondary research such as white papers, articles,
and books were used to supplement our quantitative data. Social Media for Recruiting
n Dustin Carper, Employment Brand Strategist, Groupon
n Rashmi Chanduraj, Director of Talent Acquisition, TGC Global Employment
n Jim Povec, CEO and Founder, Hiring EQ Executive Search Consultants Branding
n Sara Stowe, Talent Acquisition Partner, Smarsh
n Dr. John Sullivan, Professor of Management, San Francisco State University Conclusion
Figure 1. How many employees are
in your organization? (n = 299) Appendices 23% 14% n Less than 100 n Under 1,000 n 1,000 to 10,000 n Over 10,000 32% 31% How Important is Sourcing Passive Candidates? Background Introduction
Passive candidates are currently employed individuals who are not actively TALENT PULSE PODCAST
looking for a new position but may be interested if the right opportunity Dr. John Sullivan
comes along. Companies can benefit from hiring passive candidates Passive CEO Candidates
who likely possess the desired training, experience, and expertise for a Dr. John Sullivan &
particular position. As the economy continues to recover from the great Associates
recession, passive employees may be more likely to consider changing Social Media
jobs or companies. According to a recent survey, “super passive” candidates, or candidates who are not willing for Recruiting
to change jobs at all, are down 25 percent from 2012 to 15 percent.1 As a result, organizations may have more
success in luring proven employees into their organizations. Employment Branding
Though there may be more employees who are willing to consider changing jobs and positions, recruiters
struggle to engage passive candidates. It is estimated that 75 percent of recruiters struggle to connect with
passive candidates, most likely due to their approach or lack of time.2 For companies to successfully hire passive Conclusion
candidates, they must be able to appeal to the motives and interests of the candidates.3 Likewise, organizations
must be able to manage their company reputation. According to a survey of professionals, 75 percent say they
won’t take a job with a company that has a poor reputation.4 Appendices
“We’re not going to get passive candidates because we have LinkedIn. There has to be
background relatedness. There has to be something to trigger the passive candidate to want
to call, there has to be something in that email that gets their attention. I don’t think in-house
recruiters know how to do that.
Anytime you can talk growth, improvement, and additional responsibility to passive candidates,
that’s what hooks them, not money. It’s working in an industry that they’ve wanted to work in their whole life.”
—Jim Povec, CEO and Founder, HiringEQ, Executive Search Consultants INSIGHT 1:
Strategies for Sourcing Passive Candidates
On average, companies spend 27 percent of their time recruiting strictly passive candidates and report on Introduction
average 22 percent of their new hires last year were passive candidates. One goal of this research is to
determine how passive candidate recruitment fits into the strategy of organizations to recruit new hires at distinct
levels of employment (see Figure 2). According to our research, recruiting passive candidates is mainly used Passive
simultaneously with the recruitment of active employees for mid-levels positions (63 percent) and senior level Candidates
positions (42 percent). A little more than a third of organizations (35 percent) use passive recruitment as their
primary source of recruiting for senior level positions. Fifty-four percent of organizations say they do not recruit Social Media
passive candidates for sourcing entry-level positions. for Recruiting
Figure 2. How does the sourcing of passive candidates fit into Employment
recruiting of the following organizational levels? (n = 271) Branding 70% 63% Conclusion 60% ts 54% n e
n It is the primary source of recruiting. d n 50% o
n It is the secondary source of recruiting 42% sp
(e.g. active candidates are no good). Appendices e 40% 35% 35% f R
n It is simultaneously used with recruiting o e 30% active candidates. g ta n
n We don’t source passive candidates for e 20% 18% 17% this position. rc e 10% P 9% 10% 6% 5% 7% 0% Entry-level positions
Mid-level positions Senior-level positions (n = 275) (n = 269) (n = 269) INSIGHT 2:
Employee Referrals are Still King of Recruitment
We analyzed the channels organizations use to recruit candidates (see Table 1 and Figure 3). Participants were Introduction
asked if the channels were effective for both active candidate recruitment and passive candidate recruitment.
Employee referrals, LinkedIn, online job boards, professional networks, and company career pages are the top
five most utilized channels for sourcing candidates. Passive Candidates
Table 1. The top reported effective methods for sourcing active and passive candidates. For Active Candidates For Passive Candidates Social Media 1. Referrals 1. Referrals for Recruiting
2. Internal recruiting departments 2. LinkedIn 3. Third-party recruiters
3. Candidate relationship management tools 4. LinkedIn 4. Professional networks Employment 5. Online job boards 5. Former employees Branding
For both passive and active recruitment, employee referrals and LinkedIn are identified as effective channels of
recruitment. Former employees may be good hires for several reasons: because they may not need additional Conclusion
training; because they have garnered additional experience and skills elsewhere; and because they may now
better appreciate working at their former company as a result of working for other organizations. Appendices
Not surprisingly, active job seekers are
more likely than passive candidates
“The avenues are not traditional anymore. Applicant
to search job boards and proactively
responses through a newspaper ad and campus-related
communicate with recruiting departments
recruiting were set channels that you could track.
and recruiting firms. Candidate relationship
The margin for error was very minimal. Today, it’s not management (CRM) systems help
quite the same, especially because there are so many
organizations to manage and maintain
channels. How did this applicant finally get to our
connections with passive candidates.5 The
webpage and apply? It’s really tough to judge.”
use of this system can be an effective way
of informing passive candidates of positions
—Rashmi Chanduraj, Director of Talent Acquisition, TGC Global
relevant to their skills or interests which
may open in the future. In our sample of organizations, only 15 percent say they use CRM tools, however
76 percent say it is effective for recruiting passive candidates. Likewise, organizations may be able to interact
with a particular type of employee by searching professional networks.
Figure 3. Frequency of use for methods to source candidates —and—Of those
who use the method, the percentage who rated it as “effective or very effective”
for sourcing active candidates and for sourcing passive candidates. (n = 312)
Percentage Introduction who use 80% LinkedIn 83% 83% 85% Referrals 79% 93% Passive 42% Online job boards 77% Candidates 80% 41% Company career pages 67% 80% 71% Social Media
Internal recruiting department 66% 90% for Recruiting 74% Professional networks 66% 78% 69% Third-party recruitment 53% 86% Employment 72% Former employees 52% 76% Branding 61% Alumni associations 39% 62% 42% Facebook 38% 40% Conclusion Industry-specific social media 37% 61% 75% 36% Twitter 30% 40% 60% Online talent communities 30% 76% Appendices 54% Search engine optimization 27% 78% 28% Print media job posts 26% 48% 47% Employer videos 21% 68% Candidate relationship 76% management 15% 78% 49% Search engine marketing 14% 72% Big-data search engines 56% (e.g. Talent Bin) 11% 68%
n Effective for recruiting passive candidates n
Effective for recruiting active candidates INSIGHT 3:
Are you a Hunter or Gatherer for Passive Candidates?
Commitment is necessary to successfully hire passive candidates. Of the participating organizations in this study, Introduction
only 51 percent say they know who they are targeting in their passive candidate pools, about one-fifth offer
a streamlined application process for passive candidates (19 percent), and 46 percent say recruiting passive
candidates is part of their workforce planning strategy. Organizations that agree with at least two of the three Passive
prior statements with regards to passive candidates are labeled as “ Hunters”, whereas organizations that agree Candidates
with one or less of the statements are labeled as “Gatherers” (see Figure 4). The “Hunters” in this study report
on average that 29 percent of their hires within the past year were passive candidates, whereas the “Gatherers” Social Media
report an average of 18 percent as passive candidates. for Recruiting
Figure 4. Percentage of new hires recruited in last Employment
12 months who were passive candidates. Branding Conclusion 40% Appendices 30% 29% 20% 18% 10% 0% Gatherers Hunters (n = 70) (n = 72) INSIGHT 4:
Companies Worried about Losing Talent, but Not Straining
Relationships with Competitors
Introduction
When it comes to recruiting passive candidates (i.e., poaching) from other companies, organizations are not
terribly concerned about damaging their relationship with other organizations. While nearly half of organizations
say they recruit passive candidates from their competitors (47 percent), only 27 percent say they are concerned Passive Candidates
about straining relationships with other organizations as a result of employee poaching. Though the majority of
organizations are not apprehensive about relational issues as a result of recruiting passive candidates, nearly
two-thirds of organizations are concerned about other organizations recruiting their talent (66 percent). Social Media for Recruiting
Further analysis revealed that larger organizations are significantly more likely to recruit passive candidates
from their competitors compared to smaller organizations. This may be because larger organizations may have
more resources at their disposal to put towards recruiting passive candidates as well as the ability to provide Employment
promotional positions and requisite compensation. Participants in our study who perceive their organizations as Branding having a strong employment
Figure 5. What methods does your organization employ to keep your talent? brand are less concerned
(Select all that apply; n = 298) Conclusion about other organizations poaching their talent. Benefits 76% This study asked Flexible work 50% Appendices organizations what actions they take to prevent their Non-compete clauses 29% talent from being poached by other organizations. Paying higher than competition 26% The majority of participants say they offer competitive Employment contracts 25% benefits (76 percent) and half say they offer flexible Other 13% work arrangements. Figure 5 displays what companies Culture 7% are using to keep employees from leaving Nothing 6% as passive candidates. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percentage of Respondents
Recruitment via Social Media: Can Companies Keep Up? Background Introduction
The use of social media for recruitment is the norm for businesses today. TALENT PULSE PODCAST
Ninety-two percent of organizations say they use one of the “big three” Sara Stowe, PHR
social media sites (Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn). Likewise, 14.4 million Passive Talent Acquisition
people in the United States have used social media to search for a job and Candidates Partner
73 percent of organizations say they have made successful hires using Smarsh social media.6 Social Media for Recruiting
Social media is helping organizations connect and interact with candidates to a stronger degree than ever
before. Social media gives organizations the ability to generate content outside of traditional job postings, such
as blogs, news stories, and online workshops. Eighty percent of professionals say the primary reason for using Employment
social media is the ability to recruit passive candidates who otherwise might not be able to initiate contact with Branding
the organization.7 Social media is becoming more
“Getting involved in social networks is not
relevant than traditional channels of recruitment. In a Conclusion
about job seeking or job opportunities. It’s
survey of professionals, 40 percent believe traditional
job posts will be outdated. Likewise, job referrals
about creating the curiosity in what our
and social media were ranked above career pages
company does…These are smart people and all
and job boards as the most important channels of Appendices
I have to do is create the curiosity. If they are recruitment.8
interested, they’ll go check out our website,
As social media continues to transform the landscape
they’ll do their research, they’ll ask around. It’s
of talent acquisition and becomes increasingly
more so of an employer branding exercise
important to organizations, it is deemed necessary to than it is recruiting.”
explore how companies are managing and utilizing
—Sara Stowe, VP of Talent Acquisition, Smarsh this channel for recruitment. INSIGHT 1:
Growing Too Fast to Handle?
The use of social media as a platform for recruitment shows no signs of slowing. Seventy-two percent of the Introduction
participants in this survey report using social media for recruitment within their companies, with 70 percent who
report plans to increase their efforts within the next six months.
Though social media is a major channel in talent acquisition, organizations find it difficult keep up with the Passive
propensity of candidates to use social media. According to our research, only 56 percent of organizations agree Candidates
that social media recruiting is manageable for their recruiters. Likewise, only 61 percent report that they are able
to effectively connect with candidates through social media, and 55 percent agree they are able to effectively Social Media
interact with candidates through social media. There is a clear disparity between the propensity to use social for Recruiting
media and the efficiency of organizations using this channel. Employment Branding
“One challenge we’ll face is making sure that
we’re continuing to invest in tools that are
relevant. We have to make sure we’re keeping Conclusion
an eye on the relevancy of the tools and not get
comfortable with what’s great today. It might not
be the right tool even next year, it moves that fast.” Appendices
—Sara Stowe, Talent Acquisition Partner, Smarsh INSIGHT 2:
The Unintended (and Unattended) Consequences of Social Media
We asked survey participants which issues their organization worries about with regards to social media Introduction
recruitment (see Figure 6). The most prevalent concerns revolve around the general legal issues (57 percent) and
bias and discrimination (41 percent) of using social media recruitment. Forty-one percent of organizations also
express concerns with managing the high number of connections and responses from candidates via social media. Passive
A survey of organizations that rely on social media revealed 57 percent do not have procedures in place for Candidates
recruitment using social media, either formal or informal.9 Recruiting via social media may become a legal risk
for employers. Social media profiles can reveal protected class information, such as race, gender, or a disability. Social Media
If this information is used as a basis for an employment decision or to disqualify an applicant, the employer may for Recruiting
face civil rights complaints.10 As social media becomes a more mainstream channel of recruitment, it is important
for organizations to establish clear guidelines for using social media in order to minimize legal risks and maintain Employment fair practices. Branding
Figure 6. What issues does your organization Legal issues 57% Conclusion worry about regarding social media for
recruiting? (Select all
Overwhelming number of responses 41% Appendices that apply; n = 261) Bias and discrimination 41%
Identifying protected demographics 27% Applicant reactions 23% Other 16%
Lack of resources to effectively use 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percentage of Respondents INSIGHT 3:
Train, Track, and Measure the Social Media Channel
To be effective at social media for recruiting we recommend the following: Introduction
Train—Just over a third of organizations report offering social media training to recruiters
(34 percent). Organizations who offer training on social media recruitment report higher
percentages of new hires within the past 12 months recruited via social media. Passive Candidates
Track—Nearly two-thirds of participants report being able to effectively track how candidates found Social Media
their organization (65 percent). Organizations who agree they are able to effectively track candidates for Recruiting
are also more likely to agree that social media recruitment is manageable for their recruiters. Employment Measure—Finally, a Branding
Figure 7. Percentage of new hires recruited in last 12 little less than 40 percent
months who were recruited via social media. (n = 357) of organizations say they Conclusion can effectively measure Measure (n = 95) 32% the effectiveness of
social media recruitment (39 percent). Don’t measure (n = 92) 19% Appendices
We found that organizations who agree
they can measure the effectiveness of
hiring via social media have a stronger Train (n = 101) 33%
perception of their employment brand,
report earning more revenue from the Don’t train (n = 119) 18%
previous fiscal year, and report hiring
more employees via social media recruitment. Track (n = 175)
Companies who train their recruiters, 26%
track their candidates, and are able to Don’t track (n = 55) 21%
measure the effectiveness of social
media recruitment report hiring more 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
candidates via social media (see
Percentage of New Hires Recruited in the Figure 7).
Last 12 Months from Social Media Employment Branding Background
Employment branding refers to the positioning and promotion of benefits, TALENT PULSE PODCAST Introduction
culture, and company values to potential and existing employees. According Dustin Carper
to a study by LinkedIn, 82 percent of global recruiting leaders say branding Employment Brand
is a critical factor in their ability to hire top talent.11 Additionally, 59 percent Strategist Passive
of professionals believe brand management is important to HR strategy.12 Groupon Candidates
According to one study, companies with a strong brand had a 28 percent
lower turnover rate compared to companies with a weak brand.13 Social Media
Because employment brand is based strongly on the perceptions of the for Recruiting
current employees, it is recommended that professionals build a strategy
around how to influence company perception by employees.14 Companies Employment
can demonstrate what it expects from its employees and what they can Branding
expect in return by creating an employee value proposition (EVP). EVPs
are important for establishing the employment brand, as it spells out the
employee experience.15 Organizations have the ability to promote their brand Conclusion
through websites and career pages; likewise, employees are able to divulge
information about their organization through websites, such as Glassdoor, as
well as traditional methods, such as word of mouth. Given how easy it is for Appendices
employees to access and communicate via social media, it is recommended
that professionals manage their brand by being open to the feedback
received and having the flexibility to adapt. We explore how organizations are
promoting their employment brands and the consequences of having a strong (or weak) brand. INSIGHT 1:
Culture and Values are Key Elements of Employment Brand
We asked participants to rate what elements are important in creating and promoting their employment brand. In I t n r t o r d o u d c u t c i t o i n o
Almost all organizations believe culture and values are very or extremely important (94 percent), followed by
career opportunities (82 percent, see Figure 8). According to our participants, the primary functions responsible
for developing and managing the employment brand are marketing (56 percent), human resources (55 percent), Passive Methodology
senior leadership (48 percent), recruiting (38 percent), and communications (6 percent). Candidates
The majority of organizations are assessing their employment brand on a regular basis. Most organizations
review and update their brand every couple of years (36 percent) or once a year or less (35 percent). Twenty-two Re S s o e ci a alr ch M edia
percent of organizations say they never review and update their brand. F f in or d i Rn e g c s ruiting Employment
Figure 8. Percentage who indicate that the element is “very important” or “extremely Conclusions
important” in creating and promoting the employment brand. (n = 304) Branding Culture Career Compensation Work/life Senior and Values Opportunities and Benefits Balance Management Ap C p one cn l d u i s x ion Appendices 94% 82% 77% 73% 71% INSIGHT 2:
Strong Employment Brand Can Lead to more Quality Hires, Top Talent
Participants were asked about whether or not they perceived their organization as having a strong employment Introduction
brand. Less than half agreed that their employment brand is strong (43 percent). Of the organizations who say
they have a strong employer brand, quality of hire (70 percent) and attraction of top talent (70 percent) are top
measured benefits of having a strong brand (see Figure 9). It should be noted that organizations with stronger Passive
perceptions of their employment brand tend to be larger companies and report higher revenue from the Candidates
previous year compared to their competitors within their industry. Social Media Figure 9. What Quality of hire 70% for Recruiting measured benefits have establishing an employment Attraction of top talent 70% Employment brand brought your Branding organization? (Select Retention of top talent 60%
all that apply; n = 246) Positive work 58% Conclusion environment Financial success 29% Appendices Other 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Percentage of Respondents INSIGHT 3:
Employment Brand Not as Valued as Consumer Brand
Less than a third of organizations in this study agree that their organization places as much emphasis on
employment brand as their consumer brand (31 percent). However, those who agreed with this statement report
larger revenue growth compared to their competitors. This finding was significant, regardless of company size.
Likewise, organizations who agreed with this statement have more highly engaged employees and a stronger
employment brand. Organizations that focus attention on their employment brand may be reaping the benefits of
creating a work environment where the best employees want to work, as suggested by these results. INSIGHT 4:
Threats to your Employment Brand: Safeguarding Reputation in the Age of Instant Reviews Introduction
Organizations are not overly worried about feedback damaging company image; only one-fifth of organizations are
either extremely or very worried about negative reviews affecting employment brand. Thirty percent are moderately
worried, 23 percent are slightly worried, and 27 percent are not at all worried. Passive Candidates
Figure 10. How worried are you about negative reviews or feedback concerning your employment brand? (n = 298) Social Media Not at all Slightly Moderately Very Extremely Worried Worried Worried Worried Worried for Recruiting Employment Branding Conclusion 27% 23% 30% 14% 6% Percentage of Respondents Appendices
Reputation management is handled mainly by internal marketing according to 60 percent of participants,
distantly followed by PR firms (25 percent), trained social media teams (25 percent) and attorneys (23 percent). It
is not unusual for departments to cross-collaborate when it comes to managing reputation, though organizations
need to recognize that certain issues should be handled by the appropriate department.16
“Employer brand is mostly promoted through industry
reputation and word of mouth, rather than from proactive
measures taken to enhance talent acquisition.” —HCI Survey Participant
How to Improve your Employment Brand
Review your brand as it stands.
By researching your brand, professionals can understand the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for
improving their employment perception. Organizations should gather feedback about their employment brand Introduction
from multiple sources, including current employees, former employees, competitors, customers, stakeholders, and candidates. Passive
Revamp your employee value proposition. Candidates
Once an organization has gathered and reviewed its employment brand information, it is imperative to amend
or create a formal employee value proposition (EVP). Within the EVP, organizations will have the ability to Social Media
describe details of the experience an employee can expect in this position, including the work environment, total for Recruiting
compensation, the desired work skills and behaviors, and the mission, vision, and values of the organization.17 Employment
Release your content through multiple channels. Branding
Organizations should establish a strategy to continuously communicate their employment brand. Marketing can
positively influence the image of an organization and, as a result, can influence a positive public perception of an
organization as an attractive place to work.18 Employment brand can be shared in numerous forms, such as news Conclusion
stories, videos, podcasts, blogs, and through word of mouth. Appendices
Talent Acquisition Scorecard
This study asked participants how well their organizations execute the following topics within HCI’s Talent Acquisition
community. Participants rate their organizations as most effective at sourcing, assessment, and recruitment design.
Participants rate their organizations as least effective in data and analytics, and branding and social media. Introduction Recruitment Design Passive
Have a proactive talent acquisition strategy so your company can hire top Candidates
quality candidates (mean = 2.76).
Branding and Social Media Social Media
Use of social networking to attract active candidates and grab the interest for Recruiting
of passive candidates (mean = 2.27). Sourcing Employment
Your recruiting strategy has a sourcing plan to gather candidates with the Branding
skills and experience you need, as well as engage them through the entire
selection process (mean = 2.86). Assessment Conclusion
Use of assessment methods to determine a candidate’s skill level,
competencies, and behaviors in a variety of work scenarios (mean = 2.78). Appendices Technology
Interview candidates via video, reach new networks with social media and
mobile technology, and gather data to discover the effectiveness of your
talent acquisition efforts (mean = 2.31). Data and Analytics
Use of comprehensive analytics to identify talent needs, candidate pools,
and methods to evaluate for fit (mean = 2.05). Targeted Hiring and Design
Create attractive packages, development opportunities, and interesting
work challenges to attract highly skilled candidates (mean = 2.74). Prescribe and Apply
The second publication of HCI’s Talent Pulse explores three issues that are momentous to talent acquisition professionals: Introduction
RECRUiTiNg PASSivE CANDiDATES
n Continue to enhance your network.
n Decide if recruiting passive candidates is worth it
Regardless of the level of interest passive for your company.
candidates have in your organization, it is Passive
important to continuously grow your employment
Determine if your organization has the need as well Candidates
network. Adding passive candidates into your
as the ability to recruit and hire passive candidates.
organization is a more effective method for
Hiring passive candidates usually requires offering
introduction compared to cold calls or cold emails.19 Social Media
an elevated position compared to their current job,
By adding passive candidates to your network, for Recruiting
more compensation, and the ability to work in a
your company can generate interest by circulating
position and/or industry that piques their interest.
company publications, job posts, and facilitating
If your organization cannot afford to provide these Employment employee referrals.
amenities to passive candidates it may be a waste Branding
of your company’s time and resources to focus on
USiNg SOCiAL MEDiA fOR RECRUiTMENT
creating a passive candidate pool.
n Establish guidelines for recruiting via social media. Conclusion
n Create a Passive Cadidate Strategy.
Designate a trained individual or individuals in
Companies that hire more passive candidates
legal issues of social media recruitment. Recruiters
hunt for their desired talent. Organizations can be
should receive continuous education regarding 20 Appendices
proactive by making passive candidate sourcing a
responsible social media recruitment. Employers
part of their sourcing strategy, targeting specified
need to establish a formal policy for utilizing social
passive candidate pools, encouraging employee
media in recruitment, including a formal procedure
referrals, and putting in place a streamlined
for employees to follow in case they come across
application process for interested candidates.
legally sensitive information or demographics.
There are varying levels of passive candidates
and recruiters must have a strategy in place for
n Personalize your communication with employees.
each; for passive candidates interested in leaving
Findings from this study suggest recruiters are
their current positions, recruiters may want to be
struggling to interact with candidates via social
proactive with their efforts, whereas with super-
media. Send personalized emails to candidates
passive candidates, recruiters should focus on
and allow for two-way communication. Social media building relationships.
will be more effective and valued if customers,
candidates, and employees can engage in active discussions.
n Join professional networks and other outlets.
a more desirable place to work by both current
Besides Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook, employees and candidates.
organizations should look beyond these major
n Use social media to promote your company’s brand.
social networks for connecting with potential
employees and promoting their organization’s
Social media makes it easier than ever for Introduction
organizations to share their mission, vision, and
brand. Companies can find employees with specific
skills from professional networks and niche sites (for
values to the world. Organizations can promote
example, Github, a site for software developers).
their brand by creating or sharing a number of Passive
publications, such as new stories, blog posts, press Candidates EMPLOyMENT BRANDiNg
releases, podcasts, and videos.
n focus as much attention on your employment
n Be aware of your organization’s employment brand. Social Media
brand as your consumer brand.
By being aware of your employment brand, your for Recruiting
Organizations that place as much emphasis on their
organization can be well informed in order to
employment brand as their consumer brand report
guide actions and initiatives. Employment brand Employment
larger revenue growth in the past year compared
perceptions can be discovered by surveying
to their competitors, have more highly engaged Branding
employees and also by creating focus groups,
employees, and have better perceptions of their
both internally and externally. Finally, organizations
employment brand. To build your employment
can review discussions and comments on
brand, start by evaluating your organization’s Conclusion
websites and social media to find out how people
culture and values and ask questions about how perceive their organization.
your organization can make your organization Appendices
Supplemental HCI Content
Sourcing Passive Candidates
Salesforce’s Social Recruiting Journey Introduction
How to Source Passive Talent on Facebook
Include Mobile Technology in the Recruiting Strategy
Stop Missing Talent: A Step-by-Step Guide to Passive
Connecting with Candidates through Social and Employment Branding Candidates Mobile Recruitment
Before the First Connection: The Role of The Myth of Passive Candidates Employer Branding Social Media for Recruiting
Using Facebook to Source Passive Talent
10 Must-haves for the Employment Brand Employment
Appealing to Passive Candidates at
Creating and Developing Brand Ambassadors to Branding John Hancock Life Insurance
Drive Social Brand Awareness and Recognition Employer_ment Branding Conclusion
Social Media for Recruiting
Gear Up Branding and Social Media Infographic
Social Recruiting for the Millennial Generation Appendices
Empowering Employees to Create and
Social Recruiting’s Best Kept Secret: Fast-Track
Contribute to a Strong Employer Brand: An
Your Company to Social Recruiting Success With NPR Success Story a Social Talent Community
Before the Sourcing Even Starts the Role of Webcast
Strategic Social Media Recruiting Employer Branding Podcast
Social and Mobile Recruiting—The How to Guide
Integrate Employee Culture into the Employer Executive Brand for Maximum Impact Interview
The Time is Right to Get Social
How Disney Uses YouTube to Create an Blog Social Media Best Practices Authentic Employer Brand Enterprise Content
Survey Respondent Demographics (n = 305)
Only categories with at least 6% are displayed.
87% of respondents’ organizations are based in North America. Introduction
FuncTionAl ResponsibiliTy percent
2013 oRgAnizATionAl Revenue percent Human Resources 55% less than $10 million 16% Passive Recruiting 25% $10-50 million 15% Candidates Executive Management 7% $50-100 million 11% Training and Development 7% $100-500 million 12% Social Media $500-750 million 6% for Recruiting senioRiTy percent $1-10 billion 25% Manager/Team Leader 39% $10-50 billion 7% Employment Director 28% Branding Team Member 9% Vice President 7% Conclusion indusTRy percent
Financial Services/Real Estate/Insurance 11%
Business/Professional Services 10% Appendices Other 10% Health care 9% Government 8% IT Hardware/Software 7%
Auto/Industrial/Manufacturing 6% Endnotes
1. Browne, B. (2014, March 5). Opportunity knocking: Super-passive
13. Gultekin, E. (2011, December 1). What’s the value of your
candidates on the decline. Ere.net. Retrieved from http://www.ere.
employment brand? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://talent.
net/2014/03/05/opportunity-knocking-super-passive-candidates-on-
linkedin.com/blog/index.php/2011/12/whats-the-value-of-your- the-decline/ employment-brand Introduction
2. Kutsmode, C., Milne, V. (2014, March 10). 6 classic rules of
14. Smedstad, S. (2014, March 10). #1 thing you need to know about
engagement for engaging passive candidates via social media. Ere.
employer branding [Web log post]. Blogging 4 Jobs. Retrieved from
net. Retrieved from http://www.ere.net/tags/passivecandidates/
http://www.blogging4jobs.com/social-media/1-thing-need-know- employer-branding/ Passive
3. Picard, J. (2013, December 20). Recruiting active vs. passive
candidates. [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://talent.linkedin.com/
16. Zienlinksi, D. (2014, July). A rep to protect: Sow seeds that yield a Candidates
blog/index.php/2013/12/recruiting-active-vs-passive-candidates
positive image of your company on social media. HR Magazine, 59(6), 95. 4. See note 3 above.
15. Collett, A. (2014, March 4). Four key steps to a great employee val- Social Media
5. Alibaig, S. (2013, July 30). What can CRM do for talent Acquisition?
ue proposition. [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://www.edelman. for Recruiting
[Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://www.hci.org/blog/what-can-
com/post/four-key-steps-great-employee-value-proposition/
crm-do-talent-acquisition-part-1-2
17. Yates, K., Sejen., L. (2011). Employee value propositions: Creating
6. Bennett, S. (2013, October 16). 92% of companies use social media
alignment, engagement and stronger business results. Towers Employment
for recruitment [Infographic]. Media Bistro. Retrieved from http://
Watson. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/multimedia/webcasts/
www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/social-media-recruiting_b50575 Branding Documents/11evp.pdf
7. Society for Human Resource Management (2013, April 11). SHRM
18. Kim, K. H., Jeon, B. J., Jung, H. S., Lu, W., & Jones, J. (2012).
Survey findings: Social networking websites and recruiting/selection.
Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/
Effective employment brand equity through sustainable competitive Conclusion
Articles/Pages/SHRM-Social-Networking-Websites-Recruiting-Job-
advantage, marketing strategy, and corporate image.Journal of Candidates.aspx
Business Research,65(11), 1612-1617.
19. Browne, B. (2014, March 5). Opportunity knocking: Super-passive
8. Aberdeen. (2013, May). What is your most effective source of
candidates on the decline. Ere.net. Retrieved from http://www.ere.
hire? Retrieved from http://web.jobvite.com/rs/jobvite/images/ Appendices
net/2014/03/05/opportunity-knocking-super-passive-candidates-on-
Aberdeen%20Sourcing%20Report.pdf the-decline/
9. McGraw, M. (2013). Risky recruiting business. Human Resource
20. McCullough, K., Bisco, J., Cole, C. (2013). Social media and
Executive Online. Retrieved from http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/
employment practices liability in recruiting and hiring. Plus. view/story.jhtml?id=534355315
Retrieved from http://plusweb.org/Journal/DetailsPage/tabid/109/
10. Bologna, M. (2014). Social media strategies in recruiting, hiring pose
ArticleID/8/Social-Media-and-Employment-Practices-Liability-in-
legal risks for employers. Bloomberg BNA. Retrieved from http:// Recruiting-and-Hiring.aspx
www.bna.com/social-media-strategies-n17179889714/
11. Anders, G. (2012, October 10). LinkedIn’s newest crusade: Fix that
employer brand! Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/
sites/georgeanders/2012/10/10/linkedins-newest-crusade-fix-that- employer-brand/
12. Newcombe, T. (2013, July 9). HR should lead on employer brand
management. HR magazine. Retrieved from http://www.hrmagazine.
co.uk/hr/news/1077686/hr-lead-employer-brand-management-crf- research
Human Capital Institute (HCI)
HCI is the global association for strategic talent management and new economy leadership, and a
clearinghouse for best practices and new ideas. Our network of expert practitioners, Fortune 1000 and
Global 2000 corporations, government agencies, global consultants and business schools contribute a
stream of constantly evolving information, the best of which is organized, analyzed and shared with members
through HCI communities, research, education and events. For more information, please visit www.hci.org. About HCI Research
HCI is a premier thought leader in the new discipline of strategic talent management with an unparalleled
reputation for innovation, leadership and excellence, demonstrated through cutting-edge research and
analysis. HCI Research draws from the knowledge of a large network of executive practitioners, expert
consultants, leading academics and thought leaders, as well as thorough quantitative and qualitative
analysis, to produce insightful findings and recommendations that shape strategy and encourage action
across the continuum of talent management. To learn more, please visit: http://www.hci.org/content/research. Human Capital Institute The Global Association
for Strategic Talent Management
205 Billings Farm Road, Suite 5 White River Junction, VT 05001 866-538-1909 www.hci.org #HCiresearch
Copyright © 2014 Human Capital Institute. All rights reserved.