lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?
Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
Abstract
While conventional academic finance emphasizes theories such as modern portfolio theory and the efficient
market hypothesis, the emerging field of behavioral finance investigates the psychological and sociological
issues that impact the decision-making process of individuals, groups, and organizations. This paper will discuss
some general principles of behavioral finance including the following: overconfidence, financial cognitive
dissonance, the theory of regret, and prospect theory. In conclusion, the paper will provide strategies to assist
individuals to resolve these “mental mistakes and errors” by recommending some important investment
strategies for those who invest in stocks and
mutual funds.
Introduction
During the 1990s, a new field known as behavioral
finance began to emerge in many academic journals,
business publications, and even local newspapers. The
foundations of behavioral finance, however, can be
traced back over 150 years. Several original books
written in the 1800s and early 1900s marked the
beginning of the behavioral finance school. Originally
published in 1841, MacKay’s Extraordinary Popular
Delusions And The Madness Of Crowds presents a
chronological timeline of the various panics and
schemes throughout history. This work shows how
group behavior applies to the financial markets of
today. Le Bon’s important work, The Crowd: A Study
Of The Popular Mind, discusses the role of “crowds ”
(also known as crowd psychology) and group behavior
as they apply to the fields of behavioral finance, social
psychology, sociology, and history. Selden’s 1912 book
Psychology Of The Stock Market was one of the first
to apply the field of psychology directly to the stock
market. This classic discusses the emotional and
psychological forces at work on investors and traders in
the financial markets. These three works along with
several others form the foundation of applying
psychology and sociology to the field of finance. Today,
there is an abundant supply of literature including the
phrases “psychology of investing” and “psychology of
finance” so it is evident that the search continues to find
the proper balance of traditional finance, behavioral
finance, behavioral economics, psychology, and
sociology.
The uniqueness of behavioral finance is its
integration and foundation of many different schools of
thought and fields. Scholars, theorists, and practitioners
of behavioral finance have backgrounds from a wide
range of disciplines. The foundation of behavioral
finance is an area based on an interdisciplinary
approach including scholars from the social sciences
and business schools. From the liberal arts perspective,
this includes the fields of psychology, sociology,
anthropology, economics and behavioral economics.
On the business administration side, this covers areas
such as management, marketing, finance, technology
and accounting.
This paper will provide a general overview of the
area of behavioral finance along with some major
themes and concepts. In addition, this paper will make
a preliminary attempt to assist individuals to answer the
following two questions:
How Can Investors Take Into Account the Biases
Inherent in the Rules of Thumb They Often Find
Themselves Using?
How Can Investors “know themselves better” so
They Can Develop Better Rules of Thumb?
In effect, the main purpose of these two questions is
to provide a starting point to assist investors to develop
their “own tools” (trading strategy and investment
philosophy) by using the concepts of behavioral
finance.
What is Standard Finance?
Current accepted theories in academic finance are
referred to as standard or traditional finance. The
foundation of standard finance is associated with the
modern portfolio theory and the efficient market
hypothesis. In 1952, Harry Markowitz created modern
portfolio theory while a doctoral candidate at the
University of Chicago. Modern Portfolio Theory
(MPT) is a stock or portfolio’s expected return,
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
standard deviation, and its correlation with the other
stocks or mutual funds held within the portfolio.
With these three concepts, an efficient portfolio can
be created for any group of stocks or bonds. An efficient
portfolio is a group of stocks that has the maxi-
mum (highest) expected return given the amount of risk
assumed, or, on the contrary, contains the lowest
possible risk for a given expected return.
Another main theme in standard finance is known as
the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The efficient
market hypothesis states the premise that all
information has already been reflected in a security’s
price or market value, and that the current price the
stock or bond is trading for today is its fair value. Since
stocks are considered to be at their fair value,
proponents argue that active traders or portfolio
managers cannot produce superior returns over time
that beat the market. Therefore, they believe investors
should just own the “entire market” rather attempting to
“outperform the market.” This premise is supported by
the fact that the S&P 500 stock index beats the overall
market approximately 60% to 80% of the time. Even
with the preeminence and success of these theories,
behavioral finance has begun to emerge as an
alternative to the theories of standard finance.
The Foundations of Behavioral
Finance
Discussions of behavioral finance appear within the
literature in various forms and viewpoints. Many
scholars and authors have given their own
interpretation and definition of the field. It is our belief
that the key to defining behavioral finance is to first
establish strong definitions for psychology, sociology
and finance (please see the diagram located below).
Figure 1.
Figure 1 demonstrates the important
interdisciplinary relationships that integrate behavioral
finance. When studying concepts of behavioral finance,
traditional finance is still the centerpiece; however, the
behavioral aspects of psychology and sociology are
integral catalysts within this field of study. Therefore,
the person studying behavioral finance must have a
basic understanding of the concepts of psychology,
sociology, and finance (discussed in Figure 2) to
become acquainted with overall concepts of behavioral
finance.
Figure 2.
What is Behavioral Finance?
Behavioral finance attempts to explain and increase
understanding of the reasoning patterns of investors,
including the emotional processes involved and the
degree to which they influence the decision-making
process. Essentially, behavioral finance attempts to
explain the what, why, and how of finance and
investing, from a human perspective. For instance,
behavioral finance studies financial markets as well as
providing explanations to many stock market anomalies
(such as the January effect), speculative market bubbles
(the recent retail Internet stock craze of 1999), and
crashes (crash of 1929 and 1987). There has been
considerable debate over the real definition and validity
of behavioral finance since the field itself is still
developing and refining itself. This evolutionary
process continues to occur because many scholars have
such a diverse and wide range of academic and
professional specialties. Lastly, behavioral finance
studies the psychological and sociological factors that
influence the financial decision making process of
individuals, groups, and entities as illustrated below.
The Behavioral Finance Decision Makers
Defining the Various Disciplines of Behavioral Finance
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
Figure 3.
In reviewing the literature written on behavioral
finance, our search revealed many different
interpretations and meanings of the term. The selection
process for discussing the specific viewpoints and
definitions of behavioral finance is based on the
professional background of the scholar. The discussion
within this paper was taken from academic scholars
from the behavioral finance school as well as from
investment professionals.
Behavioral Finance and
Academic Scholars
Two leading professors from Santa Clara University,
Meir Statman and Hersh Shefrin, have conducted
research in the area of behavioral finance. Statman
(1995) wrote an extensive comparison between the
emerging discipline behavioral finance vs. the old
school thoughts of “standard finance.” According to
Statman, behavior and psychology influence individual
investors and portfolio managers regarding the
financial decision making process in terms of risk
assessment (i.e. the process of establishing information
regarding suitable levels of a risk) and the issues of
framing (i.e. the way investors process information and
make decisions depending how its presented).
Shefrin (2000) describes behavioral finance as the
interaction of psychology with the financial actions and
performance of “practitioners” (all types/categories of
investors). He recommends that these investors should
be aware of their own “investment mistakes” as well the
“errors of judgment” of their counterparts. Shefrin
states, “One investors mistakes can become another
investors profits” (2000, p. 4). Furthermore, Barber
and Odean (1999, p. 41) stated that “people
systemically depart from optimal judgment and
decision making. Behavioral finance enriches
economic understanding by incorporating these aspects
of human nature into financial models.” Robert Olsen
(1998) describes the “new paradigm” or school of
thought known as an attempt to comprehend and
forecast systematic behavior in order for investors to
make more accurate and correct investment decisions.
He further makes the point that no cohesive theory of
behavioral finance yet exists, but he notes that
researchers have developed many sub-theories and
themes of behavioral finance.
Viewpoints from the Investment
Managers
An interesting phenomenon has begun to occur with
greater frequency in which professional portfolio
managers are applying the lessons of behavioral finance
by developing behaviorally-centered trading strategies
and mutual funds. For example, the portfolio manager
for Undiscovered Managers, Inc., Russell Fuller,
actually manages three behavioral finance mutual
funds: Behavioral Growth Fund, Behavioral Value
Fund, and Behavioral Long/Short Fund). Fuller (1998)
describes his viewpoint of behavioral finance by noting
his belief that people systematically make mental errors
and misjudgments when they invest their money. As a
portfolio manager or as an individual investor,
recognizing the mental mistakes of others (a mis-priced
security such as a stock or bond) may present an
opportunity to make a superior investment return
(chance to arbitrage).
Arnold Wood of Martingale Asset Management
described behavioral finance this way:
Evidence is prolific that money managers rarely
live up to expectations. In the search for reasons,
academics and practitioners alike are turning to
behavioral finance for clues. It is the study of
us…. After all, we are human, and we are not
always rational in the way equilibrium models
would like us to be. Rather we play games that
indulge self-interest…. Financial markets are a
real game. They are the arena of fear and greed.
Our apprehensions and aspirations are acted out
every day in the marketplace…. So, perhaps
prices are not always rational and efficiency may
be a textbook hoax. (Wood 1995, p. 1)
Now that you have been introduced to the general
definition and viewpoints of behavioral finance, we will
now discuss four themes of behavioral finance:
overconfidence, financial cognitive dissonance, regret
theory, and prospect theory.
What is Overconfidence?
Research scholars from the fields of psychology and
behavioral finance have studied the topic of
overconfidence. As human beings, we have a tendency
to overestimate our own skills and predictions for
success. Mahajan (1992, p. 330) defines
overconfidence as “an overestimation of the
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
probabilities for a set of events. Operationally, it is
reflected by comparing whether the specific probability
assigned is greater than the portion that is correct for all
assessments assigned that given probability.” To
illustrate:
The explosion of the space shuttle Challenger
should have not surprised anyone familiar with
the history of booster rockets— 1 failure in every
57 attempts. Yet less than a year before the
disaster, NASA set the chances of an accident at
1 in 100,000. That optimism is far from unusual:
all kinds of experts, from nuclear engineers to
physicians to be overconfident. (Rubin, 1989, p.
11)
Academic research on overconfidence has been a
recurrent theme in psychology. Take for instance the
work in experimental psychology of Fishchhoff,
Slovic, and Lichtenstein (1977). This piece studied a
group of people by asking them general knowledge
questions. Each of the participants in study had to
respond to a set of standard questions in which the
answers were definitive. However, the subjects of the
study did not necessarily know the answers to the
questions. Along with each answer, a person was
expected to assign a score or percentage of confidence
as to whether or not they thought their answer was
correct. The results of this study demonstrated a
widespread and consistent tendency of overconfidence.
For instance, people who gave incorrect answers to10
percent of the questions (thus the individual should
have rated themselves at 90 percent) instead predicted
with 100 percent degree of confidence their answers
were correct. In addition, for a sample of incorrect
answers, the participants rated the likelihood of their
responses being incorrect at 1:1000, 1:10,000 and even
1:1,000,000. The difference between the reliability of
the replies and the degree of overconfidence was
consistent throughout the study.
In both the areas of psychology and behavioral
finance the subject matter of overconfidence continues
to have a substantial presence. As investors, we have an
inherent ability of forgetting or failing to learn from our
past errors (known as financial cognitive dissonance,
which will be discussed in the next section), such as a
bad investment or financial decision. This failure to
learn from our past investment decisions further adds to
our overconfidence dilemma.
In the area of gender bias, the work of Barber and
Odean (2000) has produced very interesting findings.
The study of differences in trading habits according to
an investor’s gender covered 35,000 households over
six years. The study found that men were more
overconfident than women regarding their investing
skills and that men trade more frequently. As a result,
males not only sell their investments at the wrong time
but also experience higher trading costs than their
female counterparts. Females trade less (buy and hold
their securities), at the same time sustaining lower
transaction costs. The study found that men trade 45
percent more than women and, even more astounding,
single men trade 67 percent more than single women.
The trading costs reduced men’s net returns by 2.5
percent per year compared with 1.72 percent for
women. This difference in portfolio return over time
could result in women having greater net wealth
because of the power of compounding interest over a 10
to 20 year time horizon (known as the time value of
money).
What is “Financial Cognitive
Dissonance”?
The Theory: another important theme from the field of
behavioral finance is the theory of cognitive
dissonance. Festingers theory of cognitive dissonance
(Morton, 1993) states that people feel internal tension
and anxiety when subjected to conflicting beliefs. As
individuals, we attempt to reduce our inner conflict
(decrease our dissonance) in one of two ways: 1) we
change our past values, feelings, or opinions, or, 2) we
attempt to justify or rationalize our choice. This theory
may apply to investors or traders in the stock market
who attempt to rationalize contradictory behaviors, so
that they seem to follow naturally from personal values
or viewpoints.
The work of Goetzmann and Peles (1997) examines
the role of cognitive dissonance in mutual fund
investors. They argue that some individual investors
may experience dissonance during the mutual fund
investment process, specifically, the decision to buy,
sell, or hold. Other research has shown that investor
dollars are allocated more quickly to leading funds
(mutual funds with strong performance gains) than
outflows from lagging funds (mutual funds with poor
investment returns). Essentially, the investors in the
under-performing funds are reluctant to admit they
made a “bad investment decision.” The proper course
of action would be to sell the underperformer more
quickly. However, investors choose to hold on to these
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
bad investments. By doing so, they do not have to admit
they made a investment mistake.
An Example: In “financial cognitive dissonance,” we
change our investment styles or beliefs to support our
financial decisions. For instance, recent investors who
followed a traditional investment style (fundamental
analysts) by evaluating companies using financial
criteria such as profitability measures, especially P/E
ratios, started to change their investment beliefs. Many
individual investors purchased retail Internet
companies such as IVillage.com and the Globe.com in
which these financial measures could not be applied,
since these companies had no financial track record,
very little revenues, and no net losses. These traditional
investors rationalized the change in their investment
style (past beliefs) in two ways: the first argument by
many investors is the belief (argument) that we are now
in a “new economy” in which the traditional financial
rules no
longer apply. This is usually the point in the economic
cycle in which the stock market reaches its peak. The
second action that displays cognitive dissonance is
ignoring traditional forms of investing, and buying
these Internet stocks simply based on price momentum.
Purchasing stocks based on price momentum while
ignoring basic economic principles of supply and
demand is known in the behavioral finance arena as
herd behavior. In essence, these Internet investors
contributed to the financial speculative bubble that
burst in March 2000 in Internet stocks, especially the
retail sector, which has declined dramatically from the
highs of 1999; many of these stocks have decreased up
to 70% off their all time highs.
What is the Theory of Regret?
Another prevalent theme in behavioral finance is
“regret theory.” The theory of regret states that an
individual evaluates his or her expected reactions to a
future event or situation (e.g. loss of $1,000 from
selling the stock of IBM). Bell (1982) described regret
as the emotion caused by comparing a given outcome
or state of events with the state of a foregone choice.
For instance, “when choosing between an unfamiliar
brand and a familiar brand, a consumer might consider
the regret of finding that the unfamiliar brand performs
more poorly than the familiar brand and thus be less
likely to select the unfamiliar brand” (Inman and
McAlister, 1994, p. 423).
Regret theory can also be applied to the area of
investor psychology within the stock market. Whether
an investor has contemplated purchasing a stock or
mutual fund which has declined or not, actually
purchasing the intended security will cause the investor
to experience an emotional reaction. Investors may
avoid selling stocks that have declined in value in order
to avoid the regret of having made a bad investment
choice and the discomfort of reporting the loss. In
addition, the investor sometimes finds it easier to
purchase the “hot or popular stock of the week.” In
essence the investor is just following “the crowd.”
Therefore, the investor can rationalize his or her
investment choice more easily if the stock or mutual
fund declines substantially in value. The investor can
reduce emotional reactions or feelings (lessen regret or
anxiety) since a group of individual investors also lost
money on the same bad investment.
What is Prospect Theory?
Prospect theory deals with the idea that people do not
always behave rationally. This theory holds that there
are persistent biases motivated by psychological factors
that influence people’s choices under conditions of
uncertainty. Prospect theory considers preferences as a
function of “decision weights,” and it assumes that
these weights do not always match with probabilities.
Specifically, prospect theory suggests that decision
weights tend to overweigh small probabilities and
under-weigh moderate and high probabilities. Hugh
Schwartz (1998, p. 82) articulates that “subjects
(investors) tend to evaluate prospects or possible
outcomes in terms of gains and losses relative to some
reference point rather than the final states of wealth.”
To illustrate, consider an investment selection
between
Option 1: A sure profit (gain) of $ 5,000 or
Option 2: An 80% possibility of gaining $7,000, with a
20 percent chance of receiving nothing ($ 0).
Question: Which option would give you the best
chance to maximize your profits?
Most people (investors) select the first option, which
is essentially is a “sure gain or bet.” Two theorists of
prospect theory, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky
(1979), found that most people become risk averse
when confronted with the expectation of a financial
gain. Therefore, investors choose Option 1 which is a
sure gain of $5,000. Essentially, this appears to be the
rational choice if you believe there is a high probability
of loss. However, this is in fact the less attractive
selection. If investors selected Option 2, their overall
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
performance on a cumulative basis would be a superior
choice because there is a greater payoff of $5,600. On
an investment (portfolio) approach, the result would be
calculated by: ($7,000 x 80%) + (0 + 20%) = $5,600.
Prospect theory demonstrates that if investors are
faced with the possibility of losing money, they often
take on riskier decisions aimed at loss aversion (though
they may sometimes refrain from investing altogether).
They tend to reverse or substantially alter their revealed
disposition toward risk. Lastly, this error in thinking
relative to investing ultimately may result in substantial
losses within a portfolio of investments, such as an
individual invested in a group of mutual funds.
How Should Investors Take Into
Account the Biases Inherent in
the Rules of Thumb They Often
Find Themselves Using and How
Should They Develop Better Rules
of Thumb?
As investors, we are obviously influenced by various
behavioral and psychological factors. Individuals who
invest in stocks and mutual funds should implement
several safeguards that can help control mental errors
and psychological roadblocks. A key approach to
controlling these mental roadblocks is for all types of
investors to implement a disciplined trading strategy.
In the case of stock investments: the best way for
investors to control their “mental mistakes” is to focus
on a specific investment strategy over the long-term.
Investors should keep detailed records outlining such
matters as why a specific stock was purchased for their
portfolio. Also, investors should decide upon specific
criteria for making an investment decision to buy, sell,
or hold. For example, an investor should create an
investment checklist that discusses questions such as
these:
Why did an investor purchase the stock?
What is their investment time horizon?
What is the expected return from this investment one
year from now?
What if a year from now the stock has under-performed
or over-performed your expectations? Do you plan
on buying, selling, or holding your position?
How risky is this stock within your overall portfolio?
The purpose of developing and maintaining an
“investment record” is that over time it will assist an
investor in evaluating investment decisions. With this
type of strategy, investors will have an easier time
admitting their mental mistakes, and it will support
them in controlling their “emotional impulses.”
Ultimately, the way to avoid these mental mistakes is to
trade less and implement a simple “buy and hold”
strategy. A long-term buy and hold investment strategy
usually outperforms a short-term trading strategy with
high portfolio turnover. Year after year it has been
documented that a passive investment strategy beats an
active investment philosophy approximately 60 to 80
percent of the time.
In the case of mutual fund investments: in terms of
mutual funds, it’s recommended that investors apply a
similar checklist” for individual stocks. Tomic and
Ricciardi (2000) recommend that investors select
mutual funds with a simple “4-step process” which
includes the following criteria:
Invest in only no-load mutual funds with low
operating expenses;
Look for funds with a strong historical track record
over 5 to 10 years;
Invest with tenured portfolio managers with a strong
investment philosophy; and
Understand the specific risk associated with each
mutual fund.
Essentially, these are good starting point criteria for
mutual fund investors. The key to successful investing
is recognizing the type of investor you are along with
implementing a solid investment strategy. Ultimately,
for most investors, the best way to maximize their
investment returns is to control their “mental errors”
with a long-term mutual fund philosophy.
In November 1999, there was a conference entitled
“Recent Advances in Behavioral Finance: A Critical
Analysis”(hosted by the Berkeley Program in Finance).
The conference featured a debate on the validity of
behavioral finance between advocates for the
“traditional finance” and “behavioral finance“ schools
of thought. There was no clear winner in this contest;
however, having such an event demonstrates the
gradual acceptance of behavioral finance. Both schools
seemed to agree that the best trading strategy is a “long-
term buy and hold” investment in a passive stock
mutual fund such as S&P 500 index. For example,
Terrance Odean, a behavioral finance expert, says in a
recent interview that he invests primarily in index
funds. As a young man, Odean said, “I traded too
actively, traded too speculatively and clung to my
losses…. I violated all the advice I now give” (Feldman,
1999, p. 174).
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
Closing Remarks
Over the last forty years, standard finance has been the
dominant theory within the academic community.
However, scholars and investment professionals
have started to investigate an alternative theory of
finance known as behavioral finance. Behavioral
finance makes an attempt to explain and improve
people’s awareness regarding the emotional factors and
psychological processes of individuals and entities that
invest in financial markets. Behavioral finance scholars
and investment professionals are developing an
appreciation for the interdisciplinary research that is the
underlying foundation of this evolving discipline. We
believe that the behaviors described in this
paper are exhibited within the stock market by many
different types of individual investors, groups of
investors, and entire organizations.
This paper has discussed four themes within the
arena of behavioral finance, which are overconfidence,
cognitive dissonance, regret theory, and prospect
theory. These four topics are an introductory
representation of the many different themes that have
started to occur over the last few years within the field
(see checklist of behavioral finance topics after this
section). The validity of all of these topics will be tested
over time as the behavioral finance scholars eventually
research and implement concepts, or as other practices
start to fad or are rejected.
This article has also discussed some trading
approaches for investors in stocks and bonds to assist
them in manifesting and controlling their psychological
roadblocks. These “rules of thumb” are a starting point
for investors that encourage them to keep an investment
track record and checklist regarding each stock or
mutual fund within their overall portfolio.
Hopefully, these behavioral finance-driven structured
guidelines for making investment choices will aid
individuals by drawing attention to potential mental
mistakes, hopefully leading to increased investment
returns.
In closing, we believe that the real debate between
the two schools of finance should address which
behavioral finance themes are relevant enough today to
be taught in the classroom and published in new
editions of finance textbooks. A concept such as
prospect theory deserves mention by finance academics
and practitioners, to offer students, faculty, and
investment professionals an alternative viewpoint of
finance.
The Behavioral Finance Checklist
Anchoring
Financial Psychology
Cascades
Chaos Theory
Cognitive Bias
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Errors
Contrarian Investing
Crashes
Fear
Greed
Herd Behavior
Framing
Hindsight Bias
Preferences
Fads
Heuristics
Manias
Panics
Disposition Effect
Loss Aversion
Prospect Theory
Regret Theory
Groupthink Theory
Anomalies
Market Inefficiency
Behavioral Economics
Overreaction
Under-reaction
Overconfidence
Mental Accounting
Irrational Behavior
Economic Psychology
Risk Perception
Gender Bias
Irrational Exuberance
Glossary of Key Terms
Academic Finance (Standard or Traditional Finance):
the current accepted theory of finance at most colleges
and universities, based on such topics as modern
portfolio theory and the efficient market hypothesis.
Anomaly or Anomalies: something that deviates from
the norm or common rule and is usually abnormal, such
as the January Effect.
Arbitrage: an attempt to enjoy a risk-less profit by
taking advantage of pricing differences in identical
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
securities being traded in different markets or in
different forms as a result of mis-pricing of securities.
Behavioral Economics: the foundation of behavioral
finance, found especially in the groundbreaking work
of Richard Thaler. This field is the alternative to
traditional economics since it applies psychology to
economics. Other examples of alternative economics
are economic psychology and socio-economics.
Behavioral Finance Theory: the belief that
psychological considerations are an essential feature of
the security markets. It is a field that attempts to explain
and increase understanding of how the emotions and
mental mistakes of investors influence the
decisionmaking process.
Bias: an inclination of temperament or outlook;
unreasoned judgment or prejudice.
Bubble: the phase before a market crash when concerns
are expressed that the stock market is overvalued or
overly inflated from speculative behavior.
Cognitive Dissonance Theory: states there is a tendency
for people to search for regularity among their
cognitions (i.e., beliefs, viewpoints). When there is a
discrepancy between feelings or behaviors
(dissonance), something must transform to eliminate
the dissonance.
Correlation: a concept from probability (statistics). It is
a measure of the degree to which two random variables
track one another, such as stock prices (stock market)
and interest rates (bond market). Crash: a steep and
abrupt drop in security market prices.
Efficient Frontier: the line on a risk-reward graph
representing a set of all efficient portfolios that
maximize expected return at each level of risk.
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH): the theory that
prices of securities fully reflect all available
information and that all market participants receive and
act on all relevant information as soon as it becomes
available.
Efficient Portfolio: a portfolio that provides the greatest
expected return for a given level of risk. Expected
return: the return expected on a risky asset based on a
normal probability distribution for all the possible rates
of return.
Finance: a discipline concerned with determining value
and making decisions. The finance function allocates
capital, including acquiring, investing, and managing
resources.
Herding or Herd Behavior: herding transpires when
a group of investors make investment decisions on a
specific piece of information while ignoring other
pertinent information such as news or financial reports.
January Effect: the January effect is generally thought
to be among the most frequent of the stock market’s
anomalies. Investors each January expect above
average gains for the month, which are most likely
caused by the result of a flood of new money (supply)
from retirement contributions, combined with optimism
for the New Year.
Loss Aversion: The idea that investors assign more
significance to losses than they assign to gains. Loss
aversion occurs when investors are less inclined to sell
stocks at a loss than they are to sell stocks that have
gained in value (even if expected returns are the
identical).
Modern Portfolio Theory: An inclusive investment
approach that assumes that all investors are risk averse
and seeks to create an optimal portfolio in consideration
of the relationship between risk and reward as measured
by alpha, beta and R-squared. Overconfidence: The
findings that people usually have too much confidence
in the accuracy of their judgments; people’s judgments
are usually not as correct as they think they are.
Panics: Sudden, widespread fear of an economic of
market collapse, which usually leads to falling stock
prices.
Prospect Theory: can be defined as how investors
assess and calculate the chance of a profit or loss in
comparison to the perceptible risk of the specific stock
or mutual fund.
Psychology: is the scientific study of behavior and
mental processes, along with how these processes are
affected by a human being’s physical, mental state, and
external environment.
Regret Theory: The theory of regret states that
individuals evaluate their expected reactions to a future
event or situation
Sociology: is the systematic study of human social
behavior and groups. This field focuses primarily on the
influence of social relationships on people’s attitudes
and behavior.
Standard Deviation: within finance, this statistic is a
very important variable for assessing the risk of stocks,
bonds, and other types of financial securities.
Time Value of Money: is the process of calculating the
value of an asset in the past, present or future. It is based
on the notion that the original principal will increase in
value over time by interest. This means that a dollar
invested today is going to be worth more tomorrow.
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following for their
insightful comments and support: Robert Fulkerth,
Steve Hawkey, Robert Olsen, Tom Powers, Hank
Pruden, Hugh Schwartz, Igor Tomic, and Mike
Troutman. An earlier version of this paper was
presented by Victor Ricciardi at the “Annual
Colloquium on Research in Economic Psychology”
July 2000 in Vienna, Austria. The sponsors of this
conference were the International Association for
Research in Economic Psychology (IAREP) and The
Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics
(SABE) in affiliation with the University of Vienna.
References
Barber, B. and Odean, T. (2000). “Boys will be Boys: Gender,
Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment.” Working Paper.
Available: http://www.undiscoveredmanagers.com/
Boys%20Will%20Be%20Boys.htm.
Barber, B. and Odean, T. (1999). “The Courage of Misguided
Convictions.” Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 41-55.
Bell, D. (1982). “Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty.”
Operations Research, 30,: 961-981.
Feldman, A. (1999). “A Finance Professor for the People.” Money,
28: 173-174.
Fishchhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S.(1977). “Knowing
with Certainty the Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 552-564.
Fuller, R. J. (1998). “Behavioral Finance and the Sources of Alpha.
Journal of Pension Plan Investing, 2 . Available: http://
www.undiscoveredmanagers.com/Sources%20of%20 Alpha.htm.
Goetzmann, W. N. and N. Peles (1993). “Cognitive Dissonance and
Mutual Fund Investors.” The Journal of Financial Research,
20,: 145-158.
Inman. J. and McAlister L. (1994). “Do Coupon Expiration Dates
Affect Consumer Behavior? Journal of Marketing Research,
31,: 423-428.
Juglar, C. (1993). Brief History of Panics in the United States, 3rd
edition. Burlington, Vermont: Fraser Publishing Company
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.). (1982). Judgment
Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge and New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An
Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrics, 47:263-291.
Le Bon, G. (1982). The Crowd: a Study of the Popular Mind.
Marietta, GA: Cherokee Publishing Company.
MacKay, C. (1980). Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the
Madness of Crowds. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.
Mahajan, J. (1992). “The Overconfidence Effect in Marketing
Management Predictions.Journal of Marketing Research, 29,:
329-342.
Morton, H. (1993). The Story of Psychology. New York, NY:
Bantam Double Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Olsen, R. A. (1998). “Behavioral Finance and its Implication for
Stock-Price Volatility.” Financial Analysts Journal. March/April:
10-17.
Peters, E. (1996). Chaos and Order in the Capital Markets, 2 nd
Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Pruden, H. (1998). “Behavioral Finance: What is it?.” Market
Technicans Association Journal. Available: http://
www.crbindex.com/pubs/trader/btv7n6/btv7n6a3.htm
Ricciardi, V. (2000). “An Exploratory Study in Behavioral Finance:
How Board of Trustees Make Behavioral Investment Decisions
Pertaining to Endowment Funds at U.S. Private Universities.”
(Preliminary Dissertation Topic).
Rubin, J. (1989). “Trends—the Dangers of Overconfidence.”
Technology Review, 92,: 11-12.
Schwartz, H. (1998). Rationality Gone Awry? Decision Making
Inconsistent with Economic and Financial Theory. Westport,
Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Selden, G. C. (1996). Psychology of the stock market, Fifth
Printing. Burlington, Vermont: Fraser Publishing Company.
Shefrin, Hersh (2000). Beyond Greed and Fear. Boston,
Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Statman, M. (1995). “Behavioral Finance vs. Standard Finance.”
Behavioral Finance and Decision Theory in Investment
Management. Charlottesville, VA: AIMR: 14-22.
Thaler, R. Editor. (1993). Advances in Behavioral Finance. New
York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Tomic, I. and Ricciardi, V. (2000). Mutual Fund Investing.
Unpublished Book.
Wood, A. (1995). “Behavioral Finance and Decision Theory in
Investment Management: an overview.” Behavioral Finance and
Decision Theory in Investment Management. Charlottesville,
VA:
AIMR: 1.
About the Authors
Victor Ricciardi is currently an adjunct faculty member
and doctoral student in finance at Golden Gate
University in San Francisco, California. Victor has
taught classes in finance, economics and behavioral
finance. His dissertation and research work is in the
field of behavioral finance. The topic of his thesis is a
study of how trustees of private universities make
investment decisions regarding endowment funds, from
a behavioral finance perspective.
Victor received his MBA in Finance and advanced
masters in Economics from St. John’s University and
BBAs in Accounting and Management from Hofstra
University. Victor began his professional career as a
mutual fund accountant for the Dreyfus Corporation
and Alliance Capital Management. In addition, he has
lOMoARcPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
been employed as an Economic Analyst at the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). He also has
completed a yet unpublished book with Dr. Igor Tomic
of St. John’s University on the topic of mutual fund
investing.
Helen K. Simon, CFP is President of Personal
Business Management Services, LLC, located in Fort
Lauderdale, Florida. Helen has resided in South Florida
since 1974 and has nearly 20 years of professional
experience in the financial services and investment
field. She serves on the adjunct faculty of Florida State
University and Nova Southeastern University where
she teaches classes in financial management, personal
finance and financial planning. She received a BBA,
Magna Cum Laude, from Florida Metropolitan
University, the CFP designation from The College for
Financial Planning, an MBA from Nova Southeastern
University and is currently pursuing a Doctorate of
Business Administration (DBA) with a concentration in
Finance. She also serves on the City of Oakland Park,
Florida Employee Pension Board.

Preview text:

lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?
Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon Abstract
While conventional academic finance emphasizes theories such as modern portfolio theory and the efficient
market hypothesis, the emerging field of behavioral finance investigates the psychological and sociological
issues that impact the decision-making process of individuals, groups, and organizations. This paper will discuss
some general principles of behavioral finance including the following: overconfidence, financial cognitive
dissonance, the theory of regret, and prospect theory. In conclusion, the paper will provide strategies to assist
individuals to resolve these “mental mistakes and errors” by recommending some important investment
strategies for those who invest in stocks and
mutual funds.
of behavioral finance have backgrounds from a wide
range of disciplines. The foundation of behavioral
finance is an area based on an interdisciplinary Introduction
approach including scholars from the social sciences
During the 1990s, a new field known as behavioral
and business schools. From the liberal arts perspective,
finance began to emerge in many academic journals,
this includes the fields of psychology, sociology,
business publications, and even local newspapers. The
anthropology, economics and behavioral economics.
foundations of behavioral finance, however, can be
On the business administration side, this covers areas
traced back over 150 years. Several original books
such as management, marketing, finance, technology
written in the 1800s and early 1900s marked the and accounting.
beginning of the behavioral finance school. Originally
This paper will provide a general overview of the
published in 1841, MacKay’s Extraordinary Popular
area of behavioral finance along with some major
Delusions And The Madness Of Crowds presents a
themes and concepts. In addition, this paper will make
chronological timeline of the various panics and
a preliminary attempt to assist individuals to answer the
schemes throughout history. This work shows how following two questions:
group behavior applies to the financial markets of
How Can Investors Take Into Account the Biases
today. Le Bon’s important work, The Crowd: A Study
Inherent in the Rules of Thumb They Often Find
Of The Popular Mind, discusses the role of “crowds ” Themselves Using?
(also known as crowd psychology) and group behavior
How Can Investors “know themselves better” so
as they apply to the fields of behavioral finance, social
They Can Develop Better Rules of Thumb?
psychology, sociology, and history. Selden’s 1912 book
In effect, the main purpose of these two questions is
Psychology Of The Stock Market was one of the first
to provide a starting point to assist investors to develop
to apply the field of psychology directly to the stock
their “own tools” (trading strategy and investment
market. This classic discusses the emotional and
philosophy) by using the concepts of behavioral
psychological forces at work on investors and traders in finance.
the financial markets. These three works along with
several others form the foundation of applying
What is Standard Finance?
psychology and sociology to the field of finance. Today,
there is an abundant supply of literature including the
Current accepted theories in academic finance are
phrases “psychology of investing” and “psychology of
referred to as standard or traditional finance. The
finance” so it is evident that the search continues to find
foundation of standard finance is associated with the
the proper balance of traditional finance, behavioral
modern portfolio theory and the efficient market
finance, behavioral economics, psychology, and
hypothesis. In 1952, Harry Markowitz created modern sociology.
portfolio theory while a doctoral candidate at the
The uniqueness of behavioral finance is its
University of Chicago. Modern Portfolio Theory
integration and foundation of many different schools of
(MPT) is a stock or portfolio’s expected return,
thought and fields. Scholars, theorists, and practitioners lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
standard deviation, and its correlation with the other
traditional finance is still the centerpiece; however, the
stocks or mutual funds held within the portfolio.
behavioral aspects of psychology and sociology are
With these three concepts, an efficient portfolio can
integral catalysts within this field of study. Therefore,
be created for any group of stocks or bonds. An efficient
the person studying behavioral finance must have a
portfolio is a group of stocks that has the maxi-
basic understanding of the concepts of psychology,
mum (highest) expected return given the amount of risk
sociology, and finance (discussed in Figure 2) to
assumed, or, on the contrary, contains the lowest
become acquainted with overall concepts of behavioral
possible risk for a given expected return. finance.
Another main theme in standard finance is known as
Defining the Various Disciplines of Behavioral Finance
the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The efficient
market hypothesis states the premise that all
information has already been reflected in a security’s
price or market value, and that the current price the
stock or bond is trading for today is its fair value. Since
stocks are considered to be at their fair value,
proponents argue that active traders or portfolio
managers cannot produce superior returns over time
that beat the market. Therefore, they believe investors
should just own the “entire market” rather attempting to
“outperform the market.” This premise is supported by Figure 2.
the fact that the S&P 500 stock index beats the overall
market approximately 60% to 80% of the time. Even
with the preeminence and success of these theories,
What is Behavioral Finance?
behavioral finance has begun to emerge as an
Behavioral finance attempts to explain and increase
alternative to the theories of standard finance.
understanding of the reasoning patterns of investors,
including the emotional processes involved and the
The Foundations of Behavioral
degree to which they influence the decision-making Finance
process. Essentially, behavioral finance attempts to
explain the what, why, and how of finance and
Discussions of behavioral finance appear within the
investing, from a human perspective. For instance,
literature in various forms and viewpoints. Many
behavioral finance studies financial markets as well as
scholars and authors have given their own
providing explanations to many stock market anomalies
interpretation and definition of the field. It is our belief
(such as the January effect), speculative market bubbles
that the key to defining behavioral finance is to first
(the recent retail Internet stock craze of 1999), and
establish strong definitions for psychology, sociology
crashes (crash of 1929 and 1987). There has been
and finance (please see the diagram located below).
considerable debate over the real definition and validity
of behavioral finance since the field itself is still
developing and refining itself. This evolutionary
process continues to occur because many scholars have
such a diverse and wide range of academic and
professional specialties. Lastly, behavioral finance
studies the psychological and sociological factors that
influence the financial decision making process of
individuals, groups, and entities as illustrated below.
The Behavioral Finance Decision Makers Figure 1. Figure 1 demonstrates the important
interdisciplinary relationships that integrate behavioral
finance. When studying concepts of behavioral finance, lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon Figure 3.
Viewpoints from the Investment
In reviewing the literature written on behavioral Managers
finance, our search revealed many different
interpretations and meanings of the term. The selection
An interesting phenomenon has begun to occur with
process for discussing the specific viewpoints and
greater frequency in which professional portfolio
definitions of behavioral finance is based on the
managers are applying the lessons of behavioral finance
professional background of the scholar. The discussion
by developing behaviorally-centered trading strategies
within this paper was taken from academic scholars
and mutual funds. For example, the portfolio manager
from the behavioral finance school as well as from
for Undiscovered Managers, Inc., Russell Fuller, investment professionals.
actually manages three behavioral finance mutual Behavioral Finance and
funds: Behavioral Growth Fund, Behavioral Value
Fund, and Behavioral Long/Short Fund). Fuller (1998) Academic Scholars
describes his viewpoint of behavioral finance by noting
Two leading professors from Santa Clara University,
his belief that people systematically make mental errors
Meir Statman and Hersh Shefrin, have conducted
and misjudgments when they invest their money. As a
research in the area of behavioral finance. Statman
portfolio manager or as an individual investor,
(1995) wrote an extensive comparison between the
recognizing the mental mistakes of others (a mis-priced
emerging discipline behavioral finance vs. the old
security such as a stock or bond) may present an
school thoughts of “standard finance.” According to
opportunity to make a superior investment return
Statman, behavior and psychology influence individual (chance to arbitrage).
investors and portfolio managers regarding the
Arnold Wood of Martingale Asset Management
financial decision making process in terms of risk
described behavioral finance this way:
assessment (i.e. the process of establishing information
Evidence is prolific that money managers rarely
regarding suitable levels of a risk) and the issues of
live up to expectations. In the search for reasons,
framing (i.e. the way investors process information and
make decisions depending how its presented).
academics and practitioners alike are turning to
behavioral finance for clues. It is the study of
Shefrin (2000) describes behavioral finance as the
us…. After all, we are human, and we are not
interaction of psychology with the financial actions and
always rational in the way equilibrium models
performance of “practitioners” (all types/categories of
would like us to be. Rather we play games that
investors). He recommends that these investors should
indulge self-interest…. Financial markets are a
be aware of their own “investment mistakes” as well the
real game. They are the arena of fear and greed.
“errors of judgment” of their counterparts. Shefrin
Our apprehensions and aspirations are acted out
states, “One investor’s mistakes can become another
every day in the marketplace…. So, perhaps
investor’s profits” (2000, p. 4). Furthermore, Barber
prices are not always rational and efficiency may
and Odean (1999, p. 41) stated that “people
be a textbook hoax. (Wood 1995, p. 1)
systemically depart from optimal judgment and
decision making. Behavioral finance enriches
economic understanding by incorporating these aspects
Now that you have been introduced to the general
of human nature into financial models.” Robert Olsen
definition and viewpoints of behavioral finance, we will
(1998) describes the “new paradigm” or school of
now discuss four themes of behavioral finance:
thought known as an attempt to comprehend and
overconfidence, financial cognitive dissonance, regret
forecast systematic behavior in order for investors to theory, and prospect theory.
make more accurate and correct investment decisions.
He further makes the point that no cohesive theory of What is Overconfidence?
behavioral finance yet exists, but he notes that
researchers have developed many sub-theories and
Research scholars from the fields of psychology and themes of behavioral finance.
behavioral finance have studied the topic of
overconfidence. As human beings, we have a tendency
to overestimate our own skills and predictions for success. Mahajan (1992, p. 330) defines
overconfidence as “an overestimation of the lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
probabilities for a set of events. Operationally, it is
Odean (2000) has produced very interesting findings.
reflected by comparing whether the specific probability
The study of differences in trading habits according to
assigned is greater than the portion that is correct for all
an investor’s gender covered 35,000 households over
assessments assigned that given probability.” To
six years. The study found that men were more illustrate:
overconfident than women regarding their investing
skills and that men trade more frequently. As a result,
The explosion of the space shuttle Challenger
males not only sell their investments at the wrong time
should have not surprised anyone familiar with
but also experience higher trading costs than their
the history of booster rockets— 1 failure in every
female counterparts. Females trade less (buy and hold
57 attempts. Yet less than a year before the
their securities), at the same time sustaining lower
disaster, NASA set the chances of an accident at
transaction costs. The study found that men trade 45
1 in 100,000. That optimism is far from unusual:
percent more than women and, even more astounding,
all kinds of experts, from nuclear engineers to
single men trade 67 percent more than single women.
physicians to be overconfident. (Rubin, 1989, p.
The trading costs reduced men’s net returns by 2.5 11)
percent per year compared with 1.72 percent for
women. This difference in portfolio return over time
Academic research on overconfidence has been a
could result in women having greater net wealth
recurrent theme in psychology. Take for instance the
because of the power of compounding interest over a 10
work in experimental psychology of Fishchhoff,
to 20 year time horizon (known as the time value of
Slovic, and Lichtenstein (1977). This piece studied a money).
group of people by asking them general knowledge
What is “Financial Cognitive
questions. Each of the participants in study had to Dissonance”?
respond to a set of standard questions in which the
answers were definitive. However, the subjects of the
The Theory: another important theme from the field of
study did not necessarily know the answers to the
behavioral finance is the theory of cognitive
questions. Along with each answer, a person was
dissonance. Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance
expected to assign a score or percentage of confidence
(Morton, 1993) states that people feel internal tension
as to whether or not they thought their answer was
and anxiety when subjected to conflicting beliefs. As
correct. The results of this study demonstrated a
individuals, we attempt to reduce our inner conflict
widespread and consistent tendency of overconfidence.
(decrease our dissonance) in one of two ways: 1) we
For instance, people who gave incorrect answers to10
change our past values, feelings, or opinions, or, 2) we
percent of the questions (thus the individual should
attempt to justify or rationalize our choice. This theory
have rated themselves at 90 percent) instead predicted
may apply to investors or traders in the stock market
with 100 percent degree of confidence their answers
who attempt to rationalize contradictory behaviors, so
were correct. In addition, for a sample of incorrect
that they seem to follow naturally from personal values
answers, the participants rated the likelihood of their or viewpoints.
responses being incorrect at 1:1000, 1:10,000 and even
The work of Goetzmann and Peles (1997) examines
1:1,000,000. The difference between the reliability of
the role of cognitive dissonance in mutual fund
the replies and the degree of overconfidence was
investors. They argue that some individual investors
consistent throughout the study.
may experience dissonance during the mutual fund
In both the areas of psychology and behavioral
investment process, specifically, the decision to buy,
finance the subject matter of overconfidence continues
sell, or hold. Other research has shown that investor
to have a substantial presence. As investors, we have an
dollars are allocated more quickly to leading funds
inherent ability of forgetting or failing to learn from our
(mutual funds with strong performance gains) than
past errors (known as financial cognitive dissonance,
outflows from lagging funds (mutual funds with poor
which will be discussed in the next section), such as a
investment returns). Essentially, the investors in the
bad investment or financial decision. This failure to
under-performing funds are reluctant to admit they
learn from our past investment decisions further adds to
made a “bad investment decision.” The proper course our overconfidence dilemma.
of action would be to sell the underperformer more
In the area of gender bias, the work of Barber and
quickly. However, investors choose to hold on to these lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
bad investments. By doing so, they do not have to admit
an investor has contemplated purchasing a stock or
they made a investment mistake.
mutual fund which has declined or not, actually
An Example: In “financial cognitive dissonance,” we
purchasing the intended security will cause the investor
change our investment styles or beliefs to support our
to experience an emotional reaction. Investors may
financial decisions. For instance, recent investors who
avoid selling stocks that have declined in value in order
followed a traditional investment style (fundamental
to avoid the regret of having made a bad investment
analysts) by evaluating companies using financial
choice and the discomfort of reporting the loss. In
criteria such as profitability measures, especially P/E
addition, the investor sometimes finds it easier to
ratios, started to change their investment beliefs. Many
purchase the “hot or popular stock of the week.” In
individual investors purchased retail Internet
essence the investor is just following “the crowd.”
companies such as IVillage.com and the Globe.com in
Therefore, the investor can rationalize his or her
which these financial measures could not be applied,
investment choice more easily if the stock or mutual
since these companies had no financial track record,
fund declines substantially in value. The investor can
very little revenues, and no net losses. These traditional
reduce emotional reactions or feelings (lessen regret or
investors rationalized the change in their investment
anxiety) since a group of individual investors also lost
style (past beliefs) in two ways: the first argument by
money on the same bad investment.
many investors is the belief (argument) that we are now
What is Prospect Theory?
in a “new economy” in which the traditional financial rules no
Prospect theory deals with the idea that people do not
longer apply. This is usually the point in the economic
always behave rationally. This theory holds that there
cycle in which the stock market reaches its peak. The
are persistent biases motivated by psychological factors
second action that displays cognitive dissonance is
that influence people’s choices under conditions of
ignoring traditional forms of investing, and buying
uncertainty. Prospect theory considers preferences as a
these Internet stocks simply based on price momentum.
function of “decision weights,” and it assumes that
Purchasing stocks based on price momentum while
these weights do not always match with probabilities.
ignoring basic economic principles of supply and
Specifically, prospect theory suggests that decision
demand is known in the behavioral finance arena as
weights tend to overweigh small probabilities and
herd behavior. In essence, these Internet investors
under-weigh moderate and high probabilities. Hugh
contributed to the financial speculative bubble that
Schwartz (1998, p. 82) articulates that “subjects
burst in March 2000 in Internet stocks, especially the
(investors) tend to evaluate prospects or possible
retail sector, which has declined dramatically from the
outcomes in terms of gains and losses relative to some
highs of 1999; many of these stocks have decreased up
reference point rather than the final states of wealth.”
to 70% off their all time highs.
To illustrate, consider an investment selection between
What is the Theory of Regret?
Option 1: A sure profit (gain) of $ 5,000 or
Another prevalent theme in behavioral finance is
Option 2: An 80% possibility of gaining $7,000, with a
“regret theory.” The theory of regret states that an
20 percent chance of receiving nothing ($ 0).
individual evaluates his or her expected reactions to a
Question: Which option would give you the best
future event or situation (e.g. loss of $1,000 from
chance to maximize your profits?
selling the stock of IBM). Bell (1982) described regret
as the emotion caused by comparing a given outcome
Most people (investors) select the first option, which
or state of events with the state of a foregone choice.
is essentially is a “sure gain or bet.” Two theorists of
For instance, “when choosing between an unfamiliar
prospect theory, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky
brand and a familiar brand, a consumer might consider
(1979), found that most people become risk averse
the regret of finding that the unfamiliar brand performs
when confronted with the expectation of a financial
more poorly than the familiar brand and thus be less
gain. Therefore, investors choose Option 1 which is a
likely to select the unfamiliar brand” (Inman and
sure gain of $5,000. Essentially, this appears to be the McAlister, 1994, p. 423).
rational choice if you believe there is a high probability
Regret theory can also be applied to the area of
of loss. However, this is in fact the less attractive
investor psychology within the stock market. Whether
selection. If investors selected Option 2, their overall lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
performance on a cumulative basis would be a superior
type of strategy, investors will have an easier time
choice because there is a greater payoff of $5,600. On
admitting their mental mistakes, and it will support
an investment (portfolio) approach, the result would be
them in controlling their “emotional impulses.”
calculated by: ($7,000 x 80%) + (0 + 20%) = $5,600.
Ultimately, the way to avoid these mental mistakes is to
Prospect theory demonstrates that if investors are
trade less and implement a simple “buy and hold”
faced with the possibility of losing money, they often
strategy. A long-term buy and hold investment strategy
take on riskier decisions aimed at loss aversion (though
usually outperforms a short-term trading strategy with
they may sometimes refrain from investing altogether).
high portfolio turnover. Year after year it has been
They tend to reverse or substantially alter their revealed
documented that a passive investment strategy beats an
disposition toward risk. Lastly, this error in thinking
active investment philosophy approximately 60 to 80
relative to investing ultimately may result in substantial percent of the time.
losses within a portfolio of investments, such as an
In the case of mutual fund investments: in terms of
individual invested in a group of mutual funds.
mutual funds, it’s recommended that investors apply a
How Should Investors Take Into
similar “ checklist” for individual stocks. Tomic and
Account the Biases Inherent in
Ricciardi (2000) recommend that investors select
mutual funds with a simple “4-step process” which
the Rules of Thumb They Often
includes the following criteria:
Find Themselves Using and How
Invest in only no-load mutual funds with low operating expenses;
Should They Develop Better Rules
Look for funds with a strong historical track record of Thumb? over 5 to 10 years;
Invest with tenured portfolio managers with a strong
As investors, we are obviously influenced by various investment philosophy; and
behavioral and psychological factors. Individuals who
Understand the specific risk associated with each
invest in stocks and mutual funds should implement mutual fund.
several safeguards that can help control mental errors
Essentially, these are good starting point criteria for
and psychological roadblocks. A key approach to
mutual fund investors. The key to successful investing
controlling these mental roadblocks is for all types of
is recognizing the type of investor you are along with
investors to implement a disciplined trading strategy.
implementing a solid investment strategy. Ultimately,
In the case of stock investments: the best way for
for most investors, the best way to maximize their
investors to control their “mental mistakes” is to focus
investment returns is to control their “mental errors”
on a specific investment strategy over the long-term.
with a long-term mutual fund philosophy.
Investors should keep detailed records outlining such
In November 1999, there was a conference entitled
matters as why a specific stock was purchased for their
“Recent Advances in Behavioral Finance: A Critical
portfolio. Also, investors should decide upon specific
Analysis”(hosted by the Berkeley Program in Finance).
criteria for making an investment decision to buy, sell,
The conference featured a debate on the validity of
or hold. For example, an investor should create an
behavioral finance between advocates for the
investment checklist that discusses questions such as
“traditional finance” and “behavioral finance“ schools these:
of thought. There was no clear winner in this contest;
however, having such an event demonstrates the
Why did an investor purchase the stock?
gradual acceptance of behavioral finance. Both schools
What is their investment time horizon?
seemed to agree that the best trading strategy is a “long-
What is the expected return from this investment one
term buy and hold” investment in a passive stock year from now?
mutual fund such as S&P 500 index. For example,
What if a year from now the stock has under-performed
Terrance Odean, a behavioral finance expert, says in a
or over-performed your expectations? Do you plan
recent interview that he invests primarily in index
on buying, selling, or holding your position?
funds. As a young man, Odean said, “I traded too
How risky is this stock within your overall portfolio?
actively, traded too speculatively and clung to my
losses…. I violated all the advice I now give” (Feldman,
The purpose of developing and maintaining an 1999, p. 174).
“investment record” is that over time it will assist an
investor in evaluating investment decisions. With this lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon Closing Remarks
The Behavioral Finance Checklist
Over the last forty years, standard finance has been the Anchoring
dominant theory within the academic community. Financial Psychology
However, scholars and investment professionals Cascades
have started to investigate an alternative theory of Chaos Theory
finance known as behavioral finance. Behavioral Cognitive Bias
finance makes an attempt to explain and improve Cognitive Dissonance
people’s awareness regarding the emotional factors and Cognitive Errors
psychological processes of individuals and entities that Contrarian Investing
invest in financial markets. Behavioral finance scholars Crashes
and investment professionals are developing an Fear
appreciation for the interdisciplinary research that is the Greed
underlying foundation of this evolving discipline. We Herd Behavior
believe that the behaviors described in this Framing
paper are exhibited within the stock market by many Hindsight Bias
different types of individual investors, groups of Preferences
investors, and entire organizations. Fads
This paper has discussed four themes within the Heuristics
arena of behavioral finance, which are overconfidence, Manias
cognitive dissonance, regret theory, and prospect Panics
theory. These four topics are an introductory Disposition Effect
representation of the many different themes that have Loss Aversion
started to occur over the last few years within the field Prospect Theory
(see checklist of behavioral finance topics after this Regret Theory
section). The validity of all of these topics will be tested Groupthink Theory
over time as the behavioral finance scholars eventually Anomalies
research and implement concepts, or as other practices Market Inefficiency start to fad or are rejected. Behavioral Economics
This article has also discussed some trading Overreaction
approaches for investors in stocks and bonds to assist Under-reaction
them in manifesting and controlling their psychological Overconfidence
roadblocks. These “rules of thumb” are a starting point Mental Accounting
for investors that encourage them to keep an investment Irrational Behavior
track record and checklist regarding each stock or Economic Psychology
mutual fund within their overall portfolio. Risk Perception
Hopefully, these behavioral finance-driven structured
guidelines for making investment choices will aid Gender Bias
individuals by drawing attention to potential mental Irrational Exuberance
mistakes, hopefully leading to increased investment returns. Glossary of Key Terms
In closing, we believe that the real debate between
the two schools of finance should address which
Academic Finance (Standard or Traditional Finance):
behavioral finance themes are relevant enough today to
the current accepted theory of finance at most colleges
be taught in the classroom and published in new
and universities, based on such topics as modern
editions of finance textbooks. A concept such as
portfolio theory and the efficient market hypothesis.
prospect theory deserves mention by finance academics
Anomaly or Anomalies: something that deviates from
and practitioners, to offer students, faculty, and
the norm or common rule and is usually abnormal, such
investment professionals an alternative viewpoint of as the January Effect. finance.
Arbitrage: an attempt to enjoy a risk-less profit by
taking advantage of pricing differences in identical lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
securities being traded in different markets or in
January Effect: the January effect is generally thought
different forms as a result of mis-pricing of securities.
to be among the most frequent of the stock market’s
Behavioral Economics: the foundation of behavioral
anomalies. Investors each January expect above
finance, found especially in the groundbreaking work
average gains for the month, which are most likely
of Richard Thaler. This field is the alternative to
caused by the result of a flood of new money (supply)
traditional economics since it applies psychology to
from retirement contributions, combined with optimism
economics. Other examples of alternative economics for the New Year.
are economic psychology and socio-economics.
Loss Aversion: The idea that investors assign more
Behavioral Finance Theory: the belief that
significance to losses than they assign to gains. Loss
psychological considerations are an essential feature of
aversion occurs when investors are less inclined to sell
the security markets. It is a field that attempts to explain
stocks at a loss than they are to sell stocks that have
and increase understanding of how the emotions and
gained in value (even if expected returns are the
mental mistakes of investors influence the identical). decisionmaking process.
Modern Portfolio Theory: An inclusive investment
Bias: an inclination of temperament or outlook;
approach that assumes that all investors are risk averse
unreasoned judgment or prejudice.
and seeks to create an optimal portfolio in consideration
Bubble: the phase before a market crash when concerns
of the relationship between risk and reward as measured
are expressed that the stock market is overvalued or
by alpha, beta and R-squared. Overconfidence: The
overly inflated from speculative behavior.
findings that people usually have too much confidence
Cognitive Dissonance Theory: states there is a tendency
in the accuracy of their judgments; people’s judgments
for people to search for regularity among their
are usually not as correct as they think they are.
cognitions (i.e., beliefs, viewpoints). When there is a
Panics: Sudden, widespread fear of an economic of discrepancy between feelings or behaviors
market collapse, which usually leads to falling stock
(dissonance), something must transform to eliminate prices. the dissonance.
Prospect Theory: can be defined as how investors
Correlation: a concept from probability (statistics). It is
assess and calculate the chance of a profit or loss in
a measure of the degree to which two random variables
comparison to the perceptible risk of the specific stock
track one another, such as stock prices (stock market) or mutual fund.
and interest rates (bond market). Crash: a steep and
Psychology: is the scientific study of behavior and
abrupt drop in security market prices.
mental processes, along with how these processes are
Efficient Frontier: the line on a risk-reward graph
affected by a human being’s physical, mental state, and
representing a set of all efficient portfolios that external environment.
maximize expected return at each level of risk.
Regret Theory: The theory of regret states that
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH): the theory that
individuals evaluate their expected reactions to a future
prices of securities fully reflect all available event or situation
information and that all market participants receive and
Sociology: is the systematic study of human social
act on all relevant information as soon as it becomes
behavior and groups. This field focuses primarily on the available.
influence of social relationships on people’s attitudes
Efficient Portfolio: a portfolio that provides the greatest and behavior.
expected return for a given level of risk. Expected
Standard Deviation: within finance, this statistic is a
return: the return expected on a risky asset based on a
very important variable for assessing the risk of stocks,
normal probability distribution for all the possible rates
bonds, and other types of financial securities. of return.
Time Value of Money: is the process of calculating the
Finance: a discipline concerned with determining value
value of an asset in the past, present or future. It is based
and making decisions. The finance function allocates
on the notion that the original principal will increase in
capital, including acquiring, investing, and managing
value over time by interest. This means that a dollar resources.
invested today is going to be worth more tomorrow.
Herding or Herd Behavior: herding transpires when
a group of investors make investment decisions on a
specific piece of information while ignoring other
pertinent information such as news or financial reports. lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon Acknowledgements
Morton, H. (1993). The Story of Psychology. New York, NY:
Bantam Double Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
The authors would like to thank the following for their
Olsen, R. A. (1998). “Behavioral Finance and its Implication for
insightful comments and support: Robert Fulkerth,
Stock-Price Volatility.” Financial Analysts Journal. March/April:
Steve Hawkey, Robert Olsen, Tom Powers, Hank 10-17.
Pruden, Hugh Schwartz, Igor Tomic, and Mike
Peters, E. (1996). Chaos and Order in the Capital Markets, 2 nd
Troutman. An earlier version of this paper was
Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
presented by Victor Ricciardi at the “Annual
Pruden, H. (1998). “Behavioral Finance: What is it?.” Market
Colloquium on Research in Economic Psychology” Technicans Association Journal. Available: http://
www.crbindex.com/pubs/trader/btv7n6/btv7n6a3.htm
July 2000 in Vienna, Austria. The sponsors of this
Ricciardi, V. (2000). “An Exploratory Study in Behavioral Finance:
conference were the International Association for
How Board of Trustees Make Behavioral Investment Decisions
Research in Economic Psychology (IAREP) and The
Pertaining to Endowment Funds at U.S. Private Universities.”
Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics
(Preliminary Dissertation Topic).
(SABE) in affiliation with the University of Vienna.
Rubin, J. (1989). “Trends—the Dangers of Overconfidence.”
Technology Review, 92,: 11-12.
Schwartz, H. (1998). Rationality Gone Awry? Decision Making References
Inconsistent with Economic and Financial Theory. Westport,
Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Barber, B. and Odean, T. (2000). “Boys will be Boys: Gender,
Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment.” Working Paper.
Selden, G. C. (1996). Psychology of the stock market, Fifth Available:
http://www.undiscoveredmanagers.com/
Printing. Burlington, Vermont: Fraser Publishing Company. Boys%20Will%20Be%20Boys.htm.
Shefrin, Hersh (2000). Beyond Greed and Fear. Boston,
Barber, B. and Odean, T. (1999). “The Courage of Misguided
Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Convictions.” Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 41-55.
Statman, M. (1995). “Behavioral Finance vs. Standard Finance.”
Bell, D. (1982). “Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty.”
Behavioral Finance and Decision Theory in Investment
Operations Research, 30,: 961-981.
Management. Charlottesville, VA: AIMR: 14-22.
Feldman, A. (1999). “A Finance Professor for the People.” Money,
Thaler, R. Editor. (1993). Advances in Behavioral Finance. New 28: 173-174.
York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fishchhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S.(1977). “Knowing
Tomic, I. and Ricciardi, V. (2000). Mutual Fund Investing.
with Certainty the Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.” Unpublished Book.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Wood, A. (1995). “Behavioral Finance and Decision Theory in Performance, 552-564.
Investment Management: an overview.” Behavioral Finance and
Fuller, R. J. (1998). “Behavioral Finance and the Sources of Alpha.”
Decision Theory in Investment Management. Charlottesville,
Journal of Pension Plan Investing, 2 . Available: http:// VA:
www.undiscoveredmanagers.com/Sources%20of%20 Alpha.htm. AIMR: 1.
Goetzmann, W. N. and N. Peles (1993). “Cognitive Dissonance and
Mutual Fund Investors.” The Journal of Financial Research, 20,: 145-158.
Inman. J. and McAlister L. (1994). “Do Coupon Expiration Dates About the Authors
Affect Consumer Behavior?” Journal of Marketing Research, 31,: 423-428.
Victor Ricciardi is currently an adjunct faculty member
Juglar, C. (1993). Brief History of Panics in the United States, 3rd
and doctoral student in finance at Golden Gate
edition. Burlington, Vermont: Fraser Publishing Company
University in San Francisco, California. Victor has
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.). (1982). Judgment
taught classes in finance, economics and behavioral
Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge and New
finance. His dissertation and research work is in the
York: Cambridge University Press.
field of behavioral finance. The topic of his thesis is a
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An
study of how trustees of private universities make
Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrics, 47:263-291.
investment decisions regarding endowment funds, from
Le Bon, G. (1982). The Crowd: a Study of the Popular Mind.
a behavioral finance perspective.
Marietta, GA: Cherokee Publishing Company.
Victor received his MBA in Finance and advanced
MacKay, C. (1980). Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the
Madness of Crowds. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.
masters in Economics from St. John’s University and
Mahajan, J. (1992). “The Overconfidence Effect in Marketing
BBAs in Accounting and Management from Hofstra
Management Predictions.” Journal of Marketing Research, 29,:
University. Victor began his professional career as a 329-342.
mutual fund accountant for the Dreyfus Corporation
and Alliance Capital Management. In addition, he has lOMoAR cPSD| 58562220
What is Behavioral Finance?, Victor Ricciardi and Helen K. Simon
been employed as an Economic Analyst at the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). He also has
completed a yet unpublished book with Dr. Igor Tomic
of St. John’s University on the topic of mutual fund investing.
Helen K. Simon, CFP is President of Personal
Business Management Services, LLC, located in Fort
Lauderdale, Florida. Helen has resided in South Florida
since 1974 and has nearly 20 years of professional
experience in the financial services and investment
field. She serves on the adjunct faculty of Florida State
University and Nova Southeastern University where
she teaches classes in financial management, personal
finance and financial planning. She received a BBA,
Magna Cum Laude, from Florida Metropolitan
University, the CFP designation from The College for
Financial Planning, an MBA from Nova Southeastern
University and is currently pursuing a Doctorate of
Business Administration (DBA) with a concentration in
Finance. She also serves on the City of Oakland Park,
Florida Employee Pension Board.