








Preview text:
          Table of Contents 
I. ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................... 3 
II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 
III. MATERIALS AND METHODS ........................................................................................................ 4 
• Materials: ............................................................................................................................................. 4 
• Methods: ............................................................................................................................................... 4 
IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................. 6 
• Result: ................................................................................................................................................... 6 
• Discussion: ............................................................................................................................................ 7 
V. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 8 
VI. LAB NOTES ........................................................................................................................................ 9                2           I.  ABSTRACT 
The influence of solvents is of the highest priority in SN1 reactions, especially in solvolysis 
processes. These reactions include the substitution of a molecule with the aid of a solvent molecule 
that acts as a nucleophile. The kinetics study of SN1 solvolysis includes examining the influence 
of variations in solvent type, concentration, and characteristics on the reaction rate. Then can gain 
insights into how solvent effects impact reaction speeds and processes by conducting experiments 
that use different solvents with varying characteristics. The study generally entails graphing 
reaction rates in relation to various solvent characteristics, such as polarity and nucleophilicity, in 
order to identify patterns and associations. 
The objective is to examine the impact of different solvent characteristics on the rate of an 
SN1 solvolysis reaction. Firstly, a substance that reacts easily, often an alkyl halide, is mixed with 
various solvents that have various levels of polarity and nucleophilicity. The reaction is 
subsequently triggered, either by introducing a nucleophile or using a stimulating agent such as 
heat. Then add three drops 0.5 N sodium hydroxide solution and 1-2 drops of phenolphthalein 
indicator. Add three drops of t-butyl chloride to each tube individually. Immediately agitate or stir 
the contents of the tube and accurately note the time of the addition, rounding to the closet second. 
Keep shaking until the pink color vanishes, proceed to record the time once more. Perform this 
process for every solvent system. The experimental results of this study regarding the influence of 
solvents on SN1 solvolysis reactions demonstrated substantial associations between solvent 
characteristics and reaction rates. Furthermore, solvents with higher nucleophilicities had a 
competitive effect, directly influencing the rate by acting as nucleophiles themselves.  II.  INTRODUCTION 
This experiment is designed to study the kinetics of a solvolysis reaction. A solvolysis 
reaction is an SN1 reaction in which the solvent is the nucleophile. An SN1 reaction substitution 
reaction that proceeds by a two-step mechanism. In the first stage, the leaving group dissociates, 
resulting in the creation of a carbocation intermediate. In the second step, the nucleophile attacks 
the carbocation. The rate of an SN1 reaction is only affected by the substrate concentration, while 
the nucleophile, while the nucleophile concentration has no influence. Hence, the initial phase, in 
which the reaction rate is mostly influenced by the stability of the carbocation and the leaving 
group’s ability, is considered the rate-determining step. In this experiment, investigate the kinetics  3         
of solvolysis process involving t-butyl chloride in several solvents. The objective is to examine the 
influence of solvent polarity on both the rate constant and the activation energy of the reaction.  III.  MATERIALS AND METHODS  • Materials:  o 2 burets  o 6mL Acetone  o 1 micropipette 
o 6mL 95% ethanol o 1 plastic pipette  o 6mL Methanol o 2  glass pipettes  o Phenolphthalein indicator  o Clock o Sodium bicarbonate 
o 1 beaker 250mL o A few drops t-butyl chloride, less than o 1 beaker 100mL  5 mL 
o 15 test tubes, 13 x 100 mm, with corks 
o A few drops 0.5 M sodium hydroxide, 
o Thermometer less than 5 mL o Aluminum foil  • Methods: 
In experiment 9, there are a few differences from those previous experiments in setup and 
solvent system. The solvent system will be followed by the table below. Since there are up to 15 
separated mixtures that will be evaluated, highly recommend testing the solvent on the set from 3 
to 5 tubes per test. You should schedule your different runs to overlap since each reaction takes 5 
to 30 minutes (depending on the solvent mixture).             
Table 1: the solvent system for experiment  SOLVENT MIXTURES  COMPOSITION 
PERCENT BY VOLUME VOLUMES FOR 2.0 mL OF MIXTURE  SOLVENT: WATER    SOLVENT  WATER  50:50  1.0 mL  1.0 mL  4        55:45  1.1 mL  0.9 mL  60:40  1.2 mL  0.8 mL  65:35  1.3 mL  0.7 mL  70:30  1.4 mL  0.6 mL 
In a test tube that has been cleaned and labeled, add 2.0 mL of the suitable solvent mixture. 
Then, start to add the appropriate amount of solvent and distilled water using the micropipette. 
After that, to achieve thermal equilibrium, cork the test tubes and submerge them in a bath of 
constant temperature for approximately five minutes. For the duration of the experiment, keep the  water bath at 30°C, and: 
+ Add 1-2 tubes of phenolphthalein indicator and 3 drops of 0.5N sodium hydroxide solution to  each test tube. 
+ Add three droplets of t-butyl chloride to each tube one at a time. 
As soon as possible, shake or mix the contents in the tube, then note the addition's time to 
the closest second, and keep shaking. Compute the reaction time elapsed in each solvent system, 
rounding to the closest 0.1 minutes. Plot the amount of water in each solvent system against the 
passing of time. All three plots should be placed on one graph. Make notes of your findings and 
conclusions after comparing the three graphs.              5          IV.  RESULT AND DISCUSSION  • Result:   
Figure 1: Sample after adding 3 drops of 0.5N sodium hydroxide solution and 2 drops of  phenolphthalein indicator.     
  Figure 2: Sample after shaking. 
According to data in table below, the experiment included testing different solvent 
mixtures: acetone with water, methanol with water, and ethanol with water at various ratios. The 
mixture of acetone and water require the longest shaking time, while methanol and water have 
lowest shaking time. As the water content decreases, the shaking time generally increases. Test 
tubes 6 and 7 have problems, though; test tube 7 has a lower water ratio but a shorter shaking  duration.  6       
Table 2: Data collected.  Test tube  Solvent mixture  Ratio: Percentage  Shaking time  Elapsed  (solvent-mixture)  time(min)   1  Acetone and water  50:50  8mins  8  2  Acetone and water  55:45  18mins14s  18.23  3  Acetone and water  60:40  20mins40s  20.67  4  Acetone and water  65:35  60mins25s  60.42  5  Acetone and water  70:30  72mins48s  72.8  6  Ethanol and water  50:50  6mins20s  6.33  7  Ethanol and water  55:45  4mins37s  4.62  8  Ethanol and water  60:40  10mins49s  10.82  9  Ethanol and water  65:35  15mins30s  15.5  10  Ethanol and water  70:30  17mins04s  17.07  11  Methanol and water  50:50  2mins40s  2.67  12  Methanol and water  55:45  3mins02s  3.03  13  Methanol and water  60:40  4mins19s  4.32  14  Methanol and water  65:35  4mins25s  4.42  15  Methanol and water  70:30  8mins43s  8.72     Elapsed time  80  70  60  50  40  30  20  10  0  50:50  55:45  60:40  65:35  70:30  Ratio of H2O in solvent 
Elapsed time of Acetone:H2O solvent 
Elapsed time of Ethanol:H2O solvent 
Elapsed time of Methanol:H2O solvent      • Discussion: 
Polar protic solvents enhance the rate of SN1 reactions. The presence of a polar solvent is 
crucial in stabilizing both the transition state and carbocation intermediate, which are the critical 
stages in determining the speed of the SN1 reaction. The large dipole moment of the solvent  7         
interacts with the substrate, resulting in a reduction in the energy of the transition state. A solvent 
with a high degree of polarity will provide more stability to a charged ionic species, such as a 
carbocation, compared to a solvent with low polarity. 
Both Methanol and Ethanol are polar protic solvents, so it increased the SN1 reaction rate 
better than Acetone, which is not a polar protic solvent. Phenolphthalein was added to the mixture 
to observe the pH change of buffer. The less time the color changes from pink to colorless, the 
better the reaction rate is. In Acetone: Water solution, only water joins in the solvolysis reaction, 
so it took a lot of time for the SN1 reaction to form HCl as a product that reduced pH and changed 
the pink color of phenolphthalein to colorless. Compared between the efficiency of methanol and 
ethanol in SN1 reaction, methanol (CH3OH) has less electron donating group than ethanol 
(CH3CH2OH) which makes the acidic hydrogen in methanol easier to leave. In other words, the 
more polar protic solvent increases the SN1 reaction rate better because it increases the acidity of  hydrogen. 
Due to technical errors when adding t-butyl chloride and ethanol, the amount of them were 
not similar in each tube, especially between tube 6 and tube 7. Drop t-butyl chloride and ethanol 
fast would deliver less amount of it than drop it slowly. That is why test tube 7 has a lower water 
ratio than tube 6 but a shorter shaking duration.  V.  CONCLUSION 
In conclusion, the investigation into solvent effects in an SN1 solvolysis reaction provided 
a comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationship between solvent characteristics and 
reaction kinetics. The systematic exploration of various solvents revealed discernible patterns, with 
polar and nucleophilic solvents demonstrating a pronounced impact on reaction rates. The observed 
correlation underscored the significance of nucleophilic solvation in influencing the stability and 
reactivity of carbocation intermediates. These findings contribute not only to the fundamental 
understanding of reaction mechanisms but also offer practical insights for optimizing reaction 
outcomes in organic synthesis. The experiment's results emphasize the pivotal role of solvent 
selection as a strategic parameter for controlling and manipulating chemical reactions. As we delve 
deeper into the complexities of solvent-solute interactions, this study serves as a catalyst for future 
research endeavors, encouraging further exploration of solvent effects in diverse chemical 
processes. Ultimately, the knowledge gained from this kinetics study enriches our toolbox for 
designing and predicting reactions, contributing to the advancement of organic chemistry and  reaction dynamics.  8        VI.  LAB NOTES   
Figure 3: Lab notes 27th Dec 2023.  9